CPU
GPU
Radeon E6465
Popular choices:
GeForce GT 330M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 330M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce GT 330M is significantly newer (2017 vs 2011). The GeForce GT 330M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon E6465 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon E6465 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GT 330M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon E6465 | GeForce GT 330M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon E6465 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon E6465 and GeForce GT 330M
Radeon E6465
The Radeon E6465 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 2 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 231 points. Launch price was $239.99.
GeForce GT 330M
The GeForce GT 330M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 221 points. Launch price was $79.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon E6465 scores 231 and the GeForce GT 330M reaches 221 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon E6465 is built on TeraScale 2 while the GeForce GT 330M uses Pascal, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 480 (Radeon E6465) vs 384 (GeForce GT 330M).
| Feature | Radeon E6465 | GeForce GT 330M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 231+5% | 221 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 480+25% | 384 |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 24 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon E6465 | GeForce GT 330M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon E6465 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 330M has 1 GB. The GeForce GT 330M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon E6465 | GeForce GT 330M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11_0 (Radeon E6465) vs 11 (10_1) (GeForce GT 330M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon E6465 | GeForce GT 330M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11_0 | 11 (10_1) |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD 3 (Radeon E6465) vs No (GeForce GT 330M). Decoder: UVD 3 vs PureVideo VP4.
| Feature | Radeon E6465 | GeForce GT 330M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD 3 | No |
| Decoder | UVD 3 | PureVideo VP4 |
| Codecs | — | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon E6465 draws 45W versus the GeForce GT 330M's 30W — a 40% difference. The GeForce GT 330M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon E6465) vs 350W (GeForce GT 330M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon E6465 | GeForce GT 330M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 45W | 30W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 5.1 | 7.4+45% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GT 330M is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon E6465 | GeForce GT 330M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49 | — |
| Codename | Turks | GP108 |
| Release | May 2 2011 | May 17 2017 |
| Ranking | #923 | #641 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon E6465 and GeForce GT 330M
