
Radeon E6465
Popular choices:

GeForce 7800 GT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 7800 GT
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 7800 GT is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon E6465 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon E6465 | GeForce 7800 GT |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-5.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+5.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 7800 GT offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 7800 GT holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $49), it costs 59% less, resulting in a 158.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon E6465 | GeForce 7800 GT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+158.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49) | ✅More affordable ($20) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon E6465 and GeForce 7800 GT

Radeon E6465
The Radeon E6465 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 2 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 231 points. Launch price was $239.99.

GeForce 7800 GT
The GeForce 7800 GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 7 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 875 MHz to 928 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 244 points. Launch price was $699.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon E6465 scores 231 versus the GeForce 7800 GT's 244 — the GeForce 7800 GT leads by 5.6%. The Radeon E6465 is built on TeraScale 2 while the GeForce 7800 GT uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 480 (Radeon E6465) vs 2,880 (GeForce 7800 GT).
| Feature | Radeon E6465 | GeForce 7800 GT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 231 | 244+6% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 480 | 2880+500% |
| ROPs | 8 | 48+500% |
| TMUs | 24 | 240+900% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon E6465 | GeForce 7800 GT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon E6465 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 7800 GT has 256 MB. The Radeon E6465 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon E6465 | GeForce 7800 GT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11_0 (Radeon E6465) vs 9.0c (GeForce 7800 GT). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon E6465 | GeForce 7800 GT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11_0+22% | 9.0c |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD 3 (Radeon E6465) vs No (GeForce 7800 GT). Decoder: UVD 3 vs PureVideo.
| Feature | Radeon E6465 | GeForce 7800 GT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD 3 | No |
| Decoder | UVD 3 | PureVideo |
| Codecs | — | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon E6465 draws 45W versus the GeForce 7800 GT's 250W — a 139% difference. The Radeon E6465 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon E6465) vs 350W (GeForce 7800 GT). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 168mm vs 228mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | Radeon E6465 | GeForce 7800 GT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 45W-82% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 168mm | 228mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 5.1+410% | 1.0 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon E6465 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the GeForce 7800 GT launched at $449 and now averages $20. The GeForce 7800 GT costs 59.2% less ($29 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 4.7 (Radeon E6465) vs 12.2 (GeForce 7800 GT) — the GeForce 7800 GT offers 159.6% better value. The GeForce 7800 GT is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon E6465 | GeForce 7800 GT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $449 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49 | $20-59% |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.7 | 12.2+160% |
| Codename | Turks | GK110B |
| Release | May 2 2011 | November 7 2013 |
| Ranking | #923 | #278 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















