Radeon E8870PCIe vs Radeon Pro 460

AMD

Radeon E8870PCIe

2014Core: 575 MHzBoost: 625 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon Pro 460

2016Core: 850 MHzBoost: 907 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon E8870PCIe vs Radeon Pro 460 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon E8870PCIe vs Radeon Pro 460 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon E8870PCIe vs Radeon Pro 460: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon E8870PCIe

2014

Why buy it

  • Costs $250 less on MSRP ($250 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
  • Delivers 95.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.5 vs 6.9 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro 460 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon Pro 460

2016

Why buy it

  • 106.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 100% HIGHER MSRP
    $500 MSRPvs$250 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.9 vs 13.5 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon Pro 460 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 106.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.5% in PassMark G3D (3,453 vs 3,368), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon E8870PCIe is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon E8870PCIe makes the most sense to buy today. It is $250 cheaper on MSRP at $250 vs $500, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 95.1% (13.5 vs 6.9), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon Pro 460 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Radeon E8870PCIe vs Radeon Pro 460 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon E8870PCIe

The Radeon E8870PCIe is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 25 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 575 MHz to 625 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 37W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,368 points.

AMD

Radeon Pro 460

The Radeon Pro 460 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 907 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,453 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon E8870PCIe scores 3,368 and the Radeon Pro 460 reaches 3,453 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon E8870PCIe is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon Pro 460 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 640 (Radeon E8870PCIe) vs 1,024 (Radeon Pro 460). Raw compute: 0.8 TFLOPS (Radeon E8870PCIe) vs 1.858 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 460). Boost clocks: 625 MHz vs 907 MHz.

FeatureRadeon E8870PCIeRadeon Pro 460
G3D Mark Score
3,368
3,453+3%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GCN 4.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
640
1024+60%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.8 TFLOPS
1.858 TFLOPS+132%
Boost Clock
625 MHz
907 MHz+45%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
40
64+60%
L1 Cache
160 KB
256 KB+60%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
1 MB+300%
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon E8870PCIeRadeon Pro 460
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon E8870PCIe and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro 460. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon E8870PCIe) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro 460) — the Radeon Pro 460 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon E8870PCIeRadeon Pro 460
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
1 MB+300%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon E8870PCIe draws 37W versus the Radeon Pro 460's 35W — a 5.6% difference. The Radeon Pro 460 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon E8870PCIe) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 460). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon E8870PCIeRadeon Pro 460
TDP
37W
35W-5%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt
91.0
98.7+8%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon E8870PCIe came in at $250, while the Radeon Pro 460 launched at $500. On MSRP, Radeon E8870PCIe was 50% cheaper ($250 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 13.5 (Radeon E8870PCIe) vs 6.9 (Radeon Pro 460) — the Radeon E8870PCIe offers 95.7% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro 460 (2016 vs 2014).

FeatureRadeon E8870PCIeRadeon Pro 460
MSRP
$250-50%
$500
Performance per Dollar
13.5+96%
6.9
Codename
Venus
Baffin
Release
January 25 2014
October 30 2016
Ranking
#734
#547

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.