
Radeon E8870PCIe vs Radeon Pro 460

Radeon E8870PCIe
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 460
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon E8870PCIe is positioned at rank 327 and the Radeon Pro 460 is on rank 176, so the Radeon Pro 460 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon E8870PCIe
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro 460
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro 460 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon E8870PCIe.
| Insight | Radeon E8870PCIe | Radeon Pro 460 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon Pro 460 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon Pro 460 holds the technical lead. Priced at $150 (vs $200), it costs 25% less, resulting in a 36.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon E8870PCIe | Radeon Pro 460 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+36.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($200) | ✅More affordable ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon E8870PCIe and Radeon Pro 460

Radeon E8870PCIe
The Radeon E8870PCIe is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 25 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 575 MHz to 625 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 37W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,368 points.

Radeon Pro 460
The Radeon Pro 460 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 907 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,453 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon E8870PCIe scores 3,368 and the Radeon Pro 460 reaches 3,453 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon E8870PCIe is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon Pro 460 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 640 (Radeon E8870PCIe) vs 1,024 (Radeon Pro 460). Raw compute: 0.8 TFLOPS (Radeon E8870PCIe) vs 1.858 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 460). Boost clocks: 625 MHz vs 907 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon E8870PCIe | Radeon Pro 460 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,368 | 3,453+3% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 1024+60% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8 TFLOPS | 1.858 TFLOPS+132% |
| Boost Clock | 625 MHz | 907 MHz+45% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40 | 64+60% |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB | 256 KB+60% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon E8870PCIe | Radeon Pro 460 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon E8870PCIe) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro 460) — the Radeon Pro 460 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon E8870PCIe | Radeon Pro 460 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon E8870PCIe draws 37W versus the Radeon Pro 460's 35W — a 5.6% difference. The Radeon Pro 460 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon E8870PCIe) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 460). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon E8870PCIe | Radeon Pro 460 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 37W | 35W-5% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 91.0 | 98.7+8% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon E8870PCIe launched at $250 MSRP and currently averages $200, while the Radeon Pro 460 launched at $500 and now averages $150. The Radeon Pro 460 costs 25% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 16.8 (Radeon E8870PCIe) vs 23.0 (Radeon Pro 460) — the Radeon Pro 460 offers 36.9% better value. The Radeon Pro 460 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon E8870PCIe | Radeon Pro 460 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $250-50% | $500 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $200 | $150-25% |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.8 | 23.0+37% |
| Codename | Venus | Baffin |
| Release | January 25 2014 | October 30 2016 |
| Ranking | #734 | #547 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















