Radeon E8870PCIe
VS
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

Radeon E8870PCIe vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

AMD

Radeon E8870PCIe

2014Core: 575 MHzBoost: 625 MHz
VS

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

2020

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon E8870PCIe is positioned at rank 327 and the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is on rank 150, so the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon E8870PCIe

#317
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
806%
#319
731%
#320
729%
#324
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
663%
#325
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
658%
#327
Radeon E8870PCIe
MSRP: $250|Avg: $200
100%
#330
Arc Graphics 140T
MSRP: $350|Avg: $300
95%
#331
Radeon 680M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $80
95%
#333
GeForce 730A
MSRP: $60|Avg: $20
95%
#334
GeForce GT 745A
MSRP: $99|Avg: $20
93%
#335
GeForce 710A
MSRP: $35|Avg: $62
92%
#336
91%
#338
GeForce MX230
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
90%
#340
RADEON HD6410D
MSRP: $35|Avg: $5
90%
#341
GeForce 820M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
89%
#342
Radeon R7 M465X
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

#42
Radeon RX 6600S
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
96%
#140
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
320%
#142
290%
#143
290%
#147
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
263%
#148
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
262%
#150
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
100%
#157
GeForce 830M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
99%
#158
GeForce GT 750M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
98%
#159
GeForce GT 425M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $25
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is significantly newer (2020 vs 2014). The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon E8870PCIe lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon E8870PCIe.

InsightRadeon E8870PCIeTiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%)
Leading raw performance (+0.7%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) (10nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $50 versus $200 for the Radeon E8870PCIe, it costs 75% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 302.6% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon E8870PCIeTiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+302.6%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($200)
More affordable ($50)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon E8870PCIe and Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

AMD

Radeon E8870PCIe

The Radeon E8870PCIe is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 25 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 575 MHz to 625 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 37W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,368 points.

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. It has 96 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,390 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon E8870PCIe scores 3,368 and the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 reaches 3,390 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon E8870PCIe is built on GCN 1.0 while the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 uses Gen. 11 Ice Lake, both on 28 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 640 (Radeon E8870PCIe) vs 96 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7).

FeatureRadeon E8870PCIeTiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
G3D Mark Score
3,368
3,390
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Process Node
28 nm
10 nm
Shading Units
640+567%
96

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon E8870PCIeTiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.

FeatureRadeon E8870PCIeTiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon E8870PCIe draws 37W versus the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7's 30W — a 20.9% difference. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon E8870PCIe) vs 350W (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon E8870PCIeTiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
TDP
37W
30W-19%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
85
Perf/Watt
91.0
113.0+24%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon E8870PCIe launched at $250 MSRP and currently averages $200, while the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 launched at $100 and now averages $50. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 costs 75% less ($150 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 16.8 (Radeon E8870PCIe) vs 67.8 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7) — the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 offers 303.6% better value. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2014).

FeatureRadeon E8870PCIeTiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
MSRP
$250
$100-60%
Avg Price (30d)
$200
$50-75%
Performance per Dollar
16.8
67.8+304%
Codename
Venus
Tiger Lake Xe
Release
January 25 2014
August 15 2020
Ranking
#734
#508