
Radeon HD 2350

Radeon X1650 SE
Radeon HD 2350 vs Radeon X1650 SE Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon HD 2350 vs Radeon X1650 SE FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon HD 2350 vs Radeon X1650 SE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon HD 2350
2012Why buy it
- ✅+8.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 200W instead of 250W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2012 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Radeon X1650 SE
2023Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (71 vs 77).
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
- ❌25% higher power demand at 250W vs 200W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 2350 vs Radeon X1650 SE Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon HD 2350
The Radeon HD 2350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1250 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 77 points. Launch price was $449.

Radeon X1650 SE
The Radeon X1650 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 17 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2581 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 71 points. Launch price was $549.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon HD 2350 scores 77 versus the Radeon X1650 SE's 71 — the Radeon HD 2350 leads by 8.5%. The Radeon HD 2350 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon X1650 SE uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon HD 2350) vs 2,560 (Radeon X1650 SE). Boost clocks: 1250 MHz vs 2581 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon HD 2350 | Radeon X1650 SE |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 77+8% | 71 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 2560+43% |
| Boost Clock | 1250 MHz | 2581 MHz+106% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 112 | 160+43% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling + RSR |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 2350 | Radeon X1650 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 2350 has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon X1650 SE carries 512 MB. Radeon X1650 SE gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon HD 2350 and 64-bit on the Radeon X1650 SE.
| Feature | Radeon HD 2350 | Radeon X1650 SE |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 2350 draws 200W versus the Radeon X1650 SE's 250W — a 22.2% difference. The Radeon HD 2350 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 2350) vs 350W (Radeon X1650 SE). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon HD 2350 | Radeon X1650 SE |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W-20% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.4+33% | 0.3 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon HD 2350 came in at $50, while the Radeon X1650 SE launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon X1650 SE was 100+% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.5 (Radeon HD 2350) vs Infinity (Radeon X1650 SE) — the Radeon X1650 SE offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon X1650 SE (2023 vs 2012).
| Feature | Radeon HD 2350 | Radeon X1650 SE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.5 | Infinity |
| Codename | Tahiti | Navi 22 |
| Release | January 31 2012 | October 17 2023 |
| Ranking | #454 | #92 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














