
Radeon HD 2350
Popular choices:

Radeon X1650 SE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon HD 2350 is positioned at rank #322 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 2350
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon X1650 SE is significantly newer (2023 vs 2012). The Radeon X1650 SE likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 2350 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 2350 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 8.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon X1650 SE offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon HD 2350 | Radeon X1650 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+8.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-8.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 2350 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $48 versus $49 for the Radeon X1650 SE, it costs 2% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 10.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 2350 | Radeon X1650 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+10.7%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($48) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

League of Legends

Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 2350 and Radeon X1650 SE

Radeon HD 2350
The Radeon HD 2350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1250 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 77 points. Launch price was $449.

Radeon X1650 SE
The Radeon X1650 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 17 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2581 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 71 points. Launch price was $549.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon HD 2350 scores 77 versus the Radeon X1650 SE's 71 — the Radeon HD 2350 leads by 8.5%. The Radeon HD 2350 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon X1650 SE uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon HD 2350) vs 2,560 (Radeon X1650 SE). Boost clocks: 1250 MHz vs 2581 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon HD 2350 | Radeon X1650 SE |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 77+8% | 71 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 2560+43% |
| Boost Clock | 1250 MHz | 2581 MHz+106% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 112 | 160+43% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 2350 | Radeon X1650 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 2350 comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon X1650 SE has 512 MB. The Radeon X1650 SE offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon HD 2350 | Radeon X1650 SE |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 2350 draws 200W versus the Radeon X1650 SE's 250W — a 22.2% difference. The Radeon HD 2350 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 2350) vs 350W (Radeon X1650 SE). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon HD 2350 | Radeon X1650 SE |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W-20% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.4+33% | 0.3 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 2350 launched at $50 MSRP and currently averages $48, while the Radeon X1650 SE launched at $0 and now averages $49. The Radeon HD 2350 costs 2% less ($1 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 1.6 (Radeon HD 2350) vs 1.4 (Radeon X1650 SE) — the Radeon HD 2350 offers 14.3% better value. The Radeon X1650 SE is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2012).
| Feature | Radeon HD 2350 | Radeon X1650 SE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $48-2% | $49 |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.6+14% | 1.4 |
| Codename | Tahiti | Navi 22 |
| Release | January 31 2012 | October 17 2023 |
| Ranking | #454 | #92 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














