Radeon HD 3200 vs RTX A3000 Mobile

AMD

Radeon HD 3200

2011Core: 750 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

RTX A3000 Mobile

2021Core: 600 MHzBoost: 1230 MHz
Similar parts
···

Radeon HD 3200 vs RTX A3000 Mobile Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon HD 3200 vs RTX A3000 Mobile FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon HD 3200 vs RTX A3000 Mobile: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon HD 3200

2011

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than RTX A3000 Mobile across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 165.7% higher power demand at 186W vs 70W.

RTX A3000 Mobile

2021

Why buy it

  • 5945.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 1500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 70W instead of 186W, a 116W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $50 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
RTX A3000 Mobile is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 5945.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 15412.2% in PassMark G3D (12,720 vs 82), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
RTX A3000 Mobile is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, a 8nm process instead of 40nm, 32 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2021 generation instead of 2011. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 3200 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 3200 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and lighter 1440p headroom, RTX A3000 Mobile has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon HD 3200 vs RTX A3000 Mobile Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon HD 3200

The Radeon HD 3200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 82 points. Launch price was $180.

NVIDIA

RTX A3000 Mobile

The RTX A3000 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 600 MHz to 1230 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,720 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon HD 3200 scores 82 versus the RTX A3000 Mobile's 12,720 — the RTX A3000 Mobile leads by 15412.2%. The Radeon HD 3200 is built on TeraScale 3 while the RTX A3000 Mobile uses Ampere, both on 40 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon HD 3200) vs 4,096 (RTX A3000 Mobile). Raw compute: 1.92 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 3200) vs 10.08 TFLOPS (RTX A3000 Mobile).

FeatureRadeon HD 3200RTX A3000 Mobile
G3D Mark Score
82
12,720+15412%
Architecture
TeraScale 3
Ampere
Process Node
40 nm
8 nm
Shading Units
1280
4096+220%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.92 TFLOPS
10.08 TFLOPS+425%
ROPs
32
64+100%
TMUs
80
128+60%
L1 Cache
0.31 MB
4 MB+1190%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
4 MB+700%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The RTX A3000 Mobile gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 3200 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureRadeon HD 3200RTX A3000 Mobile
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 3200 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the RTX A3000 Mobile carries 8 GB. RTX A3000 Mobile gives you 1500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon HD 3200 and 128-bit on the RTX A3000 Mobile. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 3200) vs 4 MB (RTX A3000 Mobile) — the RTX A3000 Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon HD 3200RTX A3000 Mobile
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
8 GB+1500%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
4 MB+700%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.0 (Radeon HD 3200) vs 12.2 (RTX A3000 Mobile). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.

FeatureRadeon HD 3200RTX A3000 Mobile
DirectX
10.0
12.2+22%
Max Displays
2
4+100%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: UVD (Radeon HD 3200) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A3000 Mobile). Decoder: UVD vs 5th Gen NVDEC.

FeatureRadeon HD 3200RTX A3000 Mobile
Encoder
UVD
7th Gen NVENC
Decoder
UVD
5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 3200 draws 186W versus the RTX A3000 Mobile's 70W — a 90.6% difference. The RTX A3000 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 3200) vs 500W (RTX A3000 Mobile). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.

FeatureRadeon HD 3200RTX A3000 Mobile
TDP
186W
70W-62%
Recommended PSU
350W-30%
500W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
1mm
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
0.4
181.7+45325%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is RTX A3000 Mobile (2021 vs 2011).

FeatureRadeon HD 3200RTX A3000 Mobile
MSRP
$50
Codename
Cayman
GA104
Release
December 1 2011
April 12 2021
Ranking
#598
#205

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.