
Radeon HD 3200

RTX A3000 Mobile
Radeon HD 3200 vs RTX A3000 Mobile Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon HD 3200 vs RTX A3000 Mobile FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon HD 3200 vs RTX A3000 Mobile: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon HD 3200
2011Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A3000 Mobile across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌165.7% higher power demand at 186W vs 70W.
RTX A3000 Mobile
2021Why buy it
- ✅5945.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅1500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 186W, a 116W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 3200 vs RTX A3000 Mobile Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon HD 3200
The Radeon HD 3200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 82 points. Launch price was $180.

RTX A3000 Mobile
The RTX A3000 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 600 MHz to 1230 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,720 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon HD 3200 scores 82 versus the RTX A3000 Mobile's 12,720 — the RTX A3000 Mobile leads by 15412.2%. The Radeon HD 3200 is built on TeraScale 3 while the RTX A3000 Mobile uses Ampere, both on 40 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon HD 3200) vs 4,096 (RTX A3000 Mobile). Raw compute: 1.92 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 3200) vs 10.08 TFLOPS (RTX A3000 Mobile).
| Feature | Radeon HD 3200 | RTX A3000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 82 | 12,720+15412% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 4096+220% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.92 TFLOPS | 10.08 TFLOPS+425% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 80 | 128+60% |
| L1 Cache | 0.31 MB | 4 MB+1190% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 4 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX A3000 Mobile gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 3200 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Radeon HD 3200 | RTX A3000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 3200 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the RTX A3000 Mobile carries 8 GB. RTX A3000 Mobile gives you 1500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon HD 3200 and 128-bit on the RTX A3000 Mobile. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 3200) vs 4 MB (RTX A3000 Mobile) — the RTX A3000 Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 3200 | RTX A3000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 8 GB+1500% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 4 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (Radeon HD 3200) vs 12.2 (RTX A3000 Mobile). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon HD 3200 | RTX A3000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0 | 12.2+22% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD (Radeon HD 3200) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A3000 Mobile). Decoder: UVD vs 5th Gen NVDEC.
| Feature | Radeon HD 3200 | RTX A3000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | UVD | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | — | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 3200 draws 186W versus the RTX A3000 Mobile's 70W — a 90.6% difference. The RTX A3000 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 3200) vs 500W (RTX A3000 Mobile). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Radeon HD 3200 | RTX A3000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 186W | 70W-62% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.4 | 181.7+45325% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is RTX A3000 Mobile (2021 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon HD 3200 | RTX A3000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50 | — |
| Codename | Cayman | GA104 |
| Release | December 1 2011 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #598 | #205 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














