Radeon HD 3300 vs Quadro FX 1400
Radeon HD 3300
Popular choices:
Quadro FX 1400
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 3300 is positioned at rank 251 and the Quadro FX 1400 is on rank 410, so the Radeon HD 3300 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 3300
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 1400
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 3300 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.4% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (512 MB vs 128 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro FX 1400.
| Insight | Radeon HD 3300 | Quadro FX 1400 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 3300 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 3300 holds the technical lead. Priced at $5 (vs $30), it costs 83% less, resulting in a 514.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 3300 | Quadro FX 1400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+514.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($5) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 3300 and Quadro FX 1400
Radeon HD 3300
The Radeon HD 3300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 127 points. Launch price was $180.
Quadro FX 1400
The Quadro FX 1400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 124 points. Launch price was $1,799.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 3300 scores 127 and the Quadro FX 1400 reaches 124 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 3300 is built on TeraScale 3 while the Quadro FX 1400 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon HD 3300) vs 192 (Quadro FX 1400). Raw compute: 1.92 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 3300) vs 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 1400).
| Feature | Radeon HD 3300 | Quadro FX 1400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 127+2% | 124 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280+567% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.92 TFLOPS+315% | 0.4623 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+33% | 24 |
| TMUs | 80+25% | 64 |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+167% | 192 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 3300 | Quadro FX 1400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 3300 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 1400 has 128 MB. The Radeon HD 3300 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon HD 3300) vs 192 KB (Quadro FX 1400) — the Radeon HD 3300 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 3300 | Quadro FX 1400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+300% | 0.125 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+167% | 192 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 3300 draws 186W versus the Quadro FX 1400's 150W — a 21.4% difference. The Quadro FX 1400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 3300) vs 350W (Quadro FX 1400). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon HD 3300 | Quadro FX 1400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 186W | 150W-19% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.7 | 0.8+14% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 3300 launched at $30 MSRP and currently averages $5, while the Quadro FX 1400 launched at $799 and now averages $30. The Radeon HD 3300 costs 83.3% less ($25 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 25.4 (Radeon HD 3300) vs 4.1 (Quadro FX 1400) — the Radeon HD 3300 offers 519.5% better value. The Radeon HD 3300 is the newer GPU (2011 vs 2008).
| Feature | Radeon HD 3300 | Quadro FX 1400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $30-96% | $799 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $5-83% | $30 |
| Performance per Dollar | 25.4+520% | 4.1 |
| Codename | Cayman | GT200B |
| Release | December 1 2011 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #598 | #884 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HD 3300 and Quadro FX 1400
