
Radeon HD 4670 vs Radeon HD 8510G

Radeon HD 4670
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 8510G
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 4670 is positioned at rank 208 and the Radeon HD 8510G is on rank 150, so the Radeon HD 8510G offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 4670
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8510G
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 4670 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 8510G.
| Insight | Radeon HD 4670 | Radeon HD 8510G |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 8510G offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 8510G holds the technical lead. Priced at $5 (vs $67), it costs 93% less, resulting in a 1208.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 4670 | Radeon HD 8510G |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1208.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($67) | ✅More affordable ($5) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 4670 and Radeon HD 8510G

Radeon HD 4670
The Radeon HD 4670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 880 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 382 points. Launch price was $369.

Radeon HD 8510G
The Radeon HD 8510G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 5 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 373 points. Launch price was $249.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 4670 scores 382 and the Radeon HD 8510G reaches 373 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 4670 is built on TeraScale 3 while the Radeon HD 8510G uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (Radeon HD 4670) vs 1,024 (Radeon HD 8510G). Raw compute: 2.703 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4670) vs 1.761 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8510G). Boost clocks: 880 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon HD 4670 | Radeon HD 8510G |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 382+2% | 373 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+50% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.703 TFLOPS+53% | 1.761 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 880 MHz | 1000 MHz+14% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 96+50% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 256 KB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 4670 | Radeon HD 8510G |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 4670 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8510G has 512 MB. The Radeon HD 4670 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon HD 4670 | Radeon HD 8510G |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (Radeon HD 4670) vs 11_0 (Radeon HD 8510G). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon HD 4670 | Radeon HD 8510G |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 11_0+9% |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.4+33% |
| Max Displays | 3 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Decoder: UVD 2.2 vs UVD 3. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,DivX (Radeon HD 4670) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Radeon HD 8510G).
| Feature | Radeon HD 4670 | Radeon HD 8510G |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | — | UVD 3 |
| Decoder | UVD 2.2 | UVD 3 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,DivX | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 4670 draws 250W versus the Radeon HD 8510G's 130W — a 63.2% difference. The Radeon HD 8510G is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Radeon HD 4670) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8510G). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 193mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Radeon HD 4670 | Radeon HD 8510G |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 130W-48% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 193mm | 1mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 1.5 | 2.9+93% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 4670 launched at $67 MSRP and currently averages $67, while the Radeon HD 8510G launched at $45 and now averages $5. The Radeon HD 8510G costs 92.5% less ($62 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 5.7 (Radeon HD 4670) vs 74.6 (Radeon HD 8510G) — the Radeon HD 8510G offers 1208.8% better value. The Radeon HD 8510G is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2010).
| Feature | Radeon HD 4670 | Radeon HD 8510G |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $67 | $45-33% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $67 | $5-93% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.7 | 74.6+1209% |
| Codename | Cayman | Pitcairn |
| Release | December 14 2010 | March 5 2012 |
| Ranking | #596 | #503 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















