
Radeon HD 4850 X2
Popular choices:

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon HD 4850 X2
2008Why buy it
- β Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- β 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs Unknown).
Trade-offs
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2008-era hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- β6150% higher power demand at 250W vs 4W.
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)
2021Why buy it
- β Less risky long-term buy than Radeon HD 4850 X2: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon HD 4850 X2 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
- β Draws 4W instead of 250W, a 246W reduction.
- β More future proof: Gen. 11 (2021) on 10nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- βLess VRAM, with Unknown vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2021-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Radeon HD 4850 X2
2008UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)
2021Why buy it
- β Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- β 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs Unknown).
Why buy it
- β Less risky long-term buy than Radeon HD 4850 X2: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon HD 4850 X2 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
- β Draws 4W instead of 250W, a 246W reduction.
- β More future proof: Gen. 11 (2021) on 10nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2008-era hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- β6150% higher power demand at 250W vs 4W.
Trade-offs
- βLess VRAM, with Unknown vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2021-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon HD 4850 X2 better than UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) make more sense than Radeon HD 4850 X2?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon HD 4850 X2 | UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 23 FPS | 50 FPS |
| medium | 13 FPS | 40 FPS |
| high | 8 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 25 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 11 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 6 FPS | 30 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 19 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 4 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 3 FPS | 20 FPS |
| high | 1 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 12 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon HD 4850 X2 | UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 39 FPS | 50 FPS |
| medium | 20 FPS | 40 FPS |
| high | 15 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 10 FPS | 25 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 18 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 10 FPS | 30 FPS |
| high | 6 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 5 FPS | 19 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 5 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 3 FPS | 18 FPS |
| high | 2 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 10 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon HD 4850 X2 | UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 51 FPS | 50 FPS |
| medium | 41 FPS | 40 FPS |
| high | 34 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 25 FPS | 25 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 38 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 31 FPS | 30 FPS |
| high | 25 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 19 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 20 FPS | 20 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 12 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon HD 4850 X2 | UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 51 FPS | 50 FPS |
| medium | 41 FPS | 40 FPS |
| high | 34 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 23 FPS | 25 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 34 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 30 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 12 FPS | 19 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 20 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 14 FPS | 20 FPS |
| high | 11 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 7 FPS | 12 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 4850 X2 and UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)

Radeon HD 4850 X2
Radeon HD 4850 X2
The Radeon HD 4850 X2 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 7 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 800 Γ2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,132 points. Launch price was $420.

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)
The UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 11 2021. It features the Gen. 11 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 800 MHz. It has 24 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 4W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,100 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 4850 X2 scores 1,132 and the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) reaches 1,100 in the G3D Mark benchmark β just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 4850 X2 is built on TeraScale while the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) uses Gen. 11, both on 55 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 800 (Radeon HD 4850 X2) vs 24 (UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)).
| Feature | Radeon HD 4850 X2 | UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,132+3% | 1,100 |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Gen. 11 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 800 Γ2+3233% | 24 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 4850 X2 | UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 4850 X2 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) has 0 MB. The Radeon HD 4850 X2 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | Radeon HD 4850 X2 | UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (Radeon HD 4850 X2) vs 12 (12_1) (UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.3. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | Radeon HD 4850 X2 | UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 12 (12_1)+19% |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6+39% |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (Radeon HD 4850 X2) vs QuickSync (UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)). Decoder: UVD 2.2 vs QuickSync. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (Radeon HD 4850 X2) vs H.264,H.265,VP8,VP9 (UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)).
| Feature | Radeon HD 4850 X2 | UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | QuickSync |
| Decoder | UVD 2.2 | QuickSync |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 | H.264,H.265,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 4850 X2 draws 250W versus the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)'s 4W β a 193.7% difference. The UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon HD 4850 X2) vs 1W (UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin vs Integrated. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 95 vs 80.
| Feature | Radeon HD 4850 X2 | UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 4W-98% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | Integrated |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 95 | 80-16% |
| Perf/Watt | 4.5 | 275.0+6011% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 4850 X2 launched at $399 MSRP, while the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) launched at $0. The UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) costs 100+% less ($399 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.8 (Radeon HD 4850 X2) vs Infinity (UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)) β the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) offers Infinity% better value. The UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2008).
| Feature | Radeon HD 4850 X2 | UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.8 | Infinity |
| Codename | R700 | Gen. 11 |
| Release | November 7 2008 | January 11 2021 |
| Ranking | #848 | #918 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












