FirePro M4170 vs Radeon HD 4850 X2

FirePro M4170

2015Core: 825 MHzBoost: 900 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon HD 4850 X2

2008Core: 625 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

FirePro M4170

2015

Why buy it

  • Costs $199 less on MSRP ($200 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
  • Delivers 105.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.8 vs 2.8 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 1 GB).
  • Draws 150W instead of 250W, a 100W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

Radeon HD 4850 X2

2008

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Very weak future-proofing: 2008-era hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • 99.5% HIGHER MSRP
    $399 MSRPvs$200 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.8 vs 5.8 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
  • 66.7% higher power demand at 250W vs 150W.

Quick Answers

So, is FirePro M4170 better than Radeon HD 4850 X2?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 1,168 vs 1,132 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer FirePro M4170 is the overall package: you are getting a newer generation, no meaningful modern upscaling stack, plus much lower power draw (150W vs 250W).
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro M4170 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2015 generation instead of 2008, more VRAM at 4 GB instead of 1 GB, the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling, and a 28nm process instead of 55nm. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
FirePro M4170 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $200 MSRP. FirePro M4170 is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. FirePro M4170 is about $199 cheaper on MSRP at $200 MSRP versus $399 MSRP, and you are getting 3.2% higher G3D Mark. Moving to $200 MSRP gets you newer hardware, lower power draw (150W vs 250W), and no meaningful modern upscaling stack.
Is Radeon HD 4850 X2 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Yes. Radeon HD 4850 X2 is still a strong gaming card in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. Price is really the swing factor here. If you find it at or below $399 MSRP, it remains a very sensible buy. FirePro M4170 is still the safer recommendation for most fresh builds because it offers a cleaner overall package with newer hardware and no meaningful modern upscaling stack.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetFirePro M4170Radeon HD 4850 X2
1080p
low18 FPS23 FPS
medium12 FPS13 FPS
high7 FPS8 FPS
ultra4 FPS4 FPS
1440p
low10 FPS11 FPS
medium6 FPS6 FPS
high3 FPS3 FPS
ultra1 FPS1 FPS
4K
low4 FPS4 FPS
medium2 FPS3 FPS
high1 FPS1 FPS
ultra1 FPS1 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetFirePro M4170Radeon HD 4850 X2
1080p
low53 FPS39 FPS
medium32 FPS20 FPS
high23 FPS15 FPS
ultra15 FPS10 FPS
1440p
low19 FPS18 FPS
medium11 FPS10 FPS
high7 FPS6 FPS
ultra6 FPS5 FPS
4K
low5 FPS5 FPS
medium3 FPS3 FPS
high2 FPS2 FPS
ultra2 FPS2 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetFirePro M4170Radeon HD 4850 X2
1080p
low53 FPS51 FPS
medium42 FPS41 FPS
high35 FPS34 FPS
ultra26 FPS25 FPS
1440p
low39 FPS38 FPS
medium32 FPS31 FPS
high26 FPS25 FPS
ultra20 FPS19 FPS
4K
low26 FPS25 FPS
medium21 FPS20 FPS
high18 FPS17 FPS
ultra13 FPS13 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetFirePro M4170Radeon HD 4850 X2
1080p
low53 FPS51 FPS
medium42 FPS41 FPS
high29 FPS34 FPS
ultra18 FPS23 FPS
1440p
low7 FPS34 FPS
medium5 FPS25 FPS
high4 FPS19 FPS
ultra2 FPS12 FPS
4K
low4 FPS20 FPS
medium3 FPS14 FPS
high2 FPS11 FPS
ultra2 FPS7 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro M4170 and Radeon HD 4850 X2

AMD

FirePro M4170

The FirePro M4170 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 23 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 825 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,168 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 4850 X2

The Radeon HD 4850 X2 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 7 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 800 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,132 points. Launch price was $420.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro M4170 scores 1,168 and the Radeon HD 4850 X2 reaches 1,132 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M4170 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon HD 4850 X2 uses TeraScale, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (FirePro M4170) vs 800 (Radeon HD 4850 X2). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (FirePro M4170) vs 1 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon HD 4850 X2).

FeatureFirePro M4170Radeon HD 4850 X2
G3D Mark Score
1,168+3%
1,132
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TeraScale
Process Node
28 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
384
800 ×2+108%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6912 TFLOPS
1 TFLOPS ×2+45%
ROPs
8
16 ×2+100%
TMUs
24
40 ×2+67%
L1 Cache
96 KB
160 KB+67%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro M4170Radeon HD 4850 X2
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro M4170 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 4850 X2 has 1 GB. The FirePro M4170 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.

FeatureFirePro M4170Radeon HD 4850 X2
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+300%
1 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro M4170) vs 10.1 (Radeon HD 4850 X2). Vulkan: 1.2 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

FeatureFirePro M4170Radeon HD 4850 X2
DirectX
12+19%
10.1
Vulkan
1.2
N/A
OpenGL
4.6+39%
3.3
Max Displays
3
4+33%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro M4170) vs None (Radeon HD 4850 X2). Decoder: UVD vs UVD 2.2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro M4170) vs MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (Radeon HD 4850 X2).

FeatureFirePro M4170Radeon HD 4850 X2
Encoder
VCE 1.0
None
Decoder
UVD
UVD 2.2
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro M4170 draws 150W versus the Radeon HD 4850 X2's 250W — a 50% difference. The FirePro M4170 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M4170) vs 500W (Radeon HD 4850 X2). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 95.

FeatureFirePro M4170Radeon HD 4850 X2
TDP
150W-40%
250W
Recommended PSU
350W-30%
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Length
0mm
267mm
Height
0mm
111mm
Slots
1-50%
2
Temp (Load)
70°C-26%
95
Perf/Watt
7.8+73%
4.5
💰

Value Analysis

The FirePro M4170 launched at $200 MSRP, while the Radeon HD 4850 X2 launched at $399. The FirePro M4170 costs 49.9% less ($199 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.8 (FirePro M4170) vs 2.8 (Radeon HD 4850 X2) — the FirePro M4170 offers 107.1% better value. The FirePro M4170 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2008).

FeatureFirePro M4170Radeon HD 4850 X2
MSRP
$200-50%
$399
Performance per Dollar
5.8+107%
2.8
Codename
Opal
R700
Release
April 23 2015
November 7 2008
Ranking
#838
#848