
FirePro M4170
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 4850 X2
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
FirePro M4170
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $199 less on MSRP ($200 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 105.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.8 vs 2.8 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 1 GB).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 250W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Radeon HD 4850 X2
2008Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2008-era hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌99.5% HIGHER MSRP$399 MSRPvs$200 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.8 vs 5.8 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 250W vs 150W.
FirePro M4170
2015Radeon HD 4850 X2
2008Why buy it
- ✅Costs $199 less on MSRP ($200 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 105.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.8 vs 2.8 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 1 GB).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 250W, a 100W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2008-era hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌99.5% HIGHER MSRP$399 MSRPvs$200 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.8 vs 5.8 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 250W vs 150W.
Quick Answers
So, is FirePro M4170 better than Radeon HD 4850 X2?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon HD 4850 X2 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | FirePro M4170 | Radeon HD 4850 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 18 FPS | 23 FPS |
| medium | 12 FPS | 13 FPS |
| high | 7 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 10 FPS | 11 FPS |
| medium | 6 FPS | 6 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 4 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 2 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | FirePro M4170 | Radeon HD 4850 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 53 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 32 FPS | 20 FPS |
| high | 23 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 10 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 19 FPS | 18 FPS |
| medium | 11 FPS | 10 FPS |
| high | 7 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 6 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 5 FPS | 5 FPS |
| medium | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | FirePro M4170 | Radeon HD 4850 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 53 FPS | 51 FPS |
| medium | 42 FPS | 41 FPS |
| high | 35 FPS | 34 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 25 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 39 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 32 FPS | 31 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 20 FPS | 19 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 21 FPS | 20 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 13 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | FirePro M4170 | Radeon HD 4850 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 53 FPS | 51 FPS |
| medium | 42 FPS | 41 FPS |
| high | 29 FPS | 34 FPS |
| ultra | 18 FPS | 23 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 7 FPS | 34 FPS |
| medium | 5 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 12 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 4 FPS | 20 FPS |
| medium | 3 FPS | 14 FPS |
| high | 2 FPS | 11 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 7 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro M4170 and Radeon HD 4850 X2

FirePro M4170
FirePro M4170
The FirePro M4170 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 23 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 825 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,168 points.

Radeon HD 4850 X2
Radeon HD 4850 X2
The Radeon HD 4850 X2 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 7 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 800 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,132 points. Launch price was $420.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro M4170 scores 1,168 and the Radeon HD 4850 X2 reaches 1,132 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M4170 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon HD 4850 X2 uses TeraScale, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (FirePro M4170) vs 800 (Radeon HD 4850 X2). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (FirePro M4170) vs 1 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon HD 4850 X2).
| Feature | FirePro M4170 | Radeon HD 4850 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,168+3% | 1,132 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 800 ×2+108% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6912 TFLOPS | 1 TFLOPS ×2+45% |
| ROPs | 8 | 16 ×2+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 40 ×2+67% |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | 160 KB+67% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro M4170 | Radeon HD 4850 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro M4170 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 4850 X2 has 1 GB. The FirePro M4170 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | FirePro M4170 | Radeon HD 4850 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+300% | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro M4170) vs 10.1 (Radeon HD 4850 X2). Vulkan: 1.2 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | FirePro M4170 | Radeon HD 4850 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12+19% | 10.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | N/A |
| OpenGL | 4.6+39% | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro M4170) vs None (Radeon HD 4850 X2). Decoder: UVD vs UVD 2.2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro M4170) vs MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (Radeon HD 4850 X2).
| Feature | FirePro M4170 | Radeon HD 4850 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | None |
| Decoder | UVD | UVD 2.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro M4170 draws 150W versus the Radeon HD 4850 X2's 250W — a 50% difference. The FirePro M4170 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M4170) vs 500W (Radeon HD 4850 X2). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 95.
| Feature | FirePro M4170 | Radeon HD 4850 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-40% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-26% | 95 |
| Perf/Watt | 7.8+73% | 4.5 |
Value Analysis
The FirePro M4170 launched at $200 MSRP, while the Radeon HD 4850 X2 launched at $399. The FirePro M4170 costs 49.9% less ($199 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.8 (FirePro M4170) vs 2.8 (Radeon HD 4850 X2) — the FirePro M4170 offers 107.1% better value. The FirePro M4170 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2008).
| Feature | FirePro M4170 | Radeon HD 4850 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $200-50% | $399 |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.8+107% | 2.8 |
| Codename | Opal | R700 |
| Release | April 23 2015 | November 7 2008 |
| Ranking | #838 | #848 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













