
Radeon HD 5670
Popular choices:

Radeon R7 A8-7600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon HD 5670
2010Why buy it
- ✅Costs $20 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $119 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 24.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.1 vs 6.5 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $119 MSRP).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 A8-7600 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌51.5% higher power demand at 250W vs 165W.
Radeon R7 A8-7600
2023Why buy it
- ✅0.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 165W instead of 250W, a 85W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌20.2% HIGHER MSRP$119 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.5 vs 8.1 G3D/$ ($119 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
Radeon HD 5670
2010Radeon R7 A8-7600
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $20 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $119 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 24.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.1 vs 6.5 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $119 MSRP).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅0.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 165W instead of 250W, a 85W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 A8-7600 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌51.5% higher power demand at 250W vs 165W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌20.2% HIGHER MSRP$119 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.5 vs 8.1 G3D/$ ($119 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon R7 A8-7600 better than Radeon HD 5670?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon HD 5670 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon HD 5670 | Radeon R7 A8-7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 29 FPS | 28 FPS |
| high | 24 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 18 FPS | 17 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 27 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 22 FPS | 21 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 13 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 18 FPS | 17 FPS |
| medium | 14 FPS | 14 FPS |
| high | 12 FPS | 12 FPS |
| ultra | 9 FPS | 9 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon HD 5670 | Radeon R7 A8-7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 29 FPS | 28 FPS |
| high | 24 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 18 FPS | 17 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 27 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 22 FPS | 21 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 13 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 18 FPS | 17 FPS |
| medium | 14 FPS | 14 FPS |
| high | 12 FPS | 12 FPS |
| ultra | 9 FPS | 9 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon HD 5670 | Radeon R7 A8-7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 29 FPS | 28 FPS |
| high | 24 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 18 FPS | 17 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 27 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 22 FPS | 21 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 13 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 18 FPS | 17 FPS |
| medium | 14 FPS | 14 FPS |
| high | 12 FPS | 12 FPS |
| ultra | 9 FPS | 9 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon HD 5670 | Radeon R7 A8-7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 29 FPS | 28 FPS |
| high | 24 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 18 FPS | 17 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 27 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 22 FPS | 21 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 13 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 18 FPS | 17 FPS |
| medium | 14 FPS | 14 FPS |
| high | 12 FPS | 12 FPS |
| ultra | 9 FPS | 9 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 5670 and Radeon R7 A8-7600

Radeon HD 5670
Radeon HD 5670
The Radeon HD 5670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 880 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 800 points. Launch price was $369.

Radeon R7 A8-7600
Radeon R7 A8-7600
The Radeon R7 A8-7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1720 MHz to 2655 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 775 points. Launch price was $269.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 5670 scores 800 and the Radeon R7 A8-7600 reaches 775 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 5670 is built on TeraScale 3 while the Radeon R7 A8-7600 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 40 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (Radeon HD 5670) vs 2,048 (Radeon R7 A8-7600). Raw compute: 2.703 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 5670) vs 21.75 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A8-7600). Boost clocks: 880 MHz vs 2655 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon HD 5670 | Radeon R7 A8-7600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 800+3% | 775 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 2048+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.703 TFLOPS | 21.75 TFLOPS+705% |
| Boost Clock | 880 MHz | 2655 MHz+202% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 96 | 128+33% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 512 KB+167% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling + RSR |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 5670 | Radeon R7 A8-7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 5670 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 A8-7600 has 512 MB. The Radeon HD 5670 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 5670) vs 2 MB (Radeon R7 A8-7600) — the Radeon R7 A8-7600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 5670 | Radeon R7 A8-7600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 5670 draws 250W versus the Radeon R7 A8-7600's 165W — a 41% difference. The Radeon R7 A8-7600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 250W (Radeon HD 5670) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A8-7600). Power connectors: None vs None.
| Feature | Radeon HD 5670 | Radeon R7 A8-7600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 165W-34% |
| Recommended PSU | 250W-29% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | None |
| Perf/Watt | 3.2 | 4.7+47% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 5670 launched at $99 MSRP, while the Radeon R7 A8-7600 launched at $119. The Radeon HD 5670 costs 16.8% less ($20 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 8.1 (Radeon HD 5670) vs 6.5 (Radeon R7 A8-7600) — the Radeon HD 5670 offers 24.6% better value. The Radeon R7 A8-7600 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2010).
| Feature | Radeon HD 5670 | Radeon R7 A8-7600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $99-17% | $119 |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.1+25% | 6.5 |
| Codename | Cayman | Navi 33 |
| Release | December 14 2010 | May 24 2023 |
| Ranking | #596 | #118 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













