
Radeon HD 5670

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700
Radeon HD 5670 vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon HD 5670 vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon HD 5670 vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon HD 5670
2010Why buy it
- ✅Costs $70 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 69.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.1 vs 4.8 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Draws 250W instead of 300W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2010 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700
2025Why buy it
- ✅4.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌70.7% HIGHER MSRP$169 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.8 vs 8.1 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
- ❌20% higher power demand at 300W vs 250W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 5670 vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon HD 5670
The Radeon HD 5670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 880 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 800 points. Launch price was $369.

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700
The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the Bristol Ridge architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 806 points. Launch price was $1,299.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 5670 scores 800 and the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 reaches 806 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 5670 is built on TeraScale 3 while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 uses Bristol Ridge, both on 40 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (Radeon HD 5670) vs 4,096 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700). Raw compute: 2.703 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 5670) vs 47.84 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700). Boost clocks: 880 MHz vs 2920 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon HD 5670 | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 800 | 806 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | Bristol Ridge |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 4096+167% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.703 TFLOPS | 47.84 TFLOPS+1670% |
| Boost Clock | 880 MHz | 2920 MHz+232% |
| ROPs | 32 | 128+300% |
| TMUs | 96 | 256+167% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 8 MB+1500% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 5670 | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 5670 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 carries 512 MB. Radeon HD 5670 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon HD 5670 and System on the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 5670) vs 8 MB (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700) — the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 5670 | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 8 MB+1500% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 5670 draws 250W versus the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700's 300W — a 18.2% difference. The Radeon HD 5670 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 250W (Radeon HD 5670) vs 350W (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon HD 5670 | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W-17% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 250W-29% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 3.2+19% | 2.7 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon HD 5670 came in at $99, while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 launched at $169. On MSRP, Radeon HD 5670 was 41.4% cheaper ($70 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 8.1 (Radeon HD 5670) vs 4.8 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700) — the Radeon HD 5670 offers 68.8% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 (2025 vs 2010).
| Feature | Radeon HD 5670 | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $99-41% | $169 |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.1+69% | 4.8 |
| Codename | Cayman | Navi 48 |
| Release | December 14 2010 | July 23 2025 |
| Ranking | #596 | #23 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















