
Radeon HD 5670

Radeon R7 M260DX
Radeon HD 5670 vs Radeon R7 M260DX Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon HD 5670 vs Radeon R7 M260DX FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon HD 5670 vs Radeon R7 M260DX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon HD 5670
2010Why buy it
- β 102.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- β Costs $201 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- β Delivers 196.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.1 vs 2.7 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- β 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- β2010 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- β233.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 75W.
Radeon R7 M260DX
2015Why buy it
- β Draws 75W instead of 250W, a 175W reduction.
- β More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012β2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- βLower average FPS than Radeon HD 5670 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- βLess VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- β2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- β203% HIGHER MSRP$300 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.7 vs 8.1 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 5670 vs Radeon R7 M260DX Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon HD 5670
The Radeon HD 5670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 880 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 800 points. Launch price was $369.

Radeon R7 M260DX
The Radeon R7 M260DX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 6 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 620 MHz to 715 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 817 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 5670 scores 800 and the Radeon R7 M260DX reaches 817 in the G3D Mark benchmark β just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 5670 is built on TeraScale 3 while the Radeon R7 M260DX uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (Radeon HD 5670) vs 384 (Radeon R7 M260DX). Raw compute: 2.703 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 5670) vs 0.5491 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M260DX). Boost clocks: 880 MHz vs 715 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon HD 5670 | Radeon R7 M260DX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 800 | 817+2% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+300% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.703 TFLOPS+392% | 0.5491 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 880 MHz+23% | 715 MHz |
| ROPs | 32+300% | 8 |
| TMUs | 96+300% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB+100% | 96 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 5670 | Radeon R7 M260DX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 5670 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 M260DX carries 512 MB. Radeon HD 5670 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon HD 5670 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M260DX. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon HD 5670) vs 256 KB (Radeon R7 M260DX) β the Radeon HD 5670 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 5670 | Radeon R7 M260DX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 5670 draws 250W versus the Radeon R7 M260DX's 75W β a 107.7% difference. The Radeon R7 M260DX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 250W (Radeon HD 5670) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M260DX). Power connectors: None vs Mobile.
| Feature | Radeon HD 5670 | Radeon R7 M260DX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 75W-70% |
| Recommended PSU | 250W-29% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | Mobile |
| Length | β | 1mm |
| Slots | β | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 3.2 | 10.9+241% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon HD 5670 came in at $99, while the Radeon R7 M260DX launched at $300. On MSRP, Radeon HD 5670 was 67% cheaper ($201 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 8.1 (Radeon HD 5670) vs 2.7 (Radeon R7 M260DX) β the Radeon HD 5670 offers 200% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 M260DX (2015 vs 2010).
| Feature | Radeon HD 5670 | Radeon R7 M260DX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $99-67% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.1+200% | 2.7 |
| Codename | Cayman | Opal |
| Release | December 14 2010 | December 6 2015 |
| Ranking | #596 | #878 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















