Radeon HD 5670 vs Radeon R9 M280X

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon HD 5670 vs Radeon R9 M280X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon HD 5670 vs Radeon R9 M280X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon HD 5670

2010

Why buy it

✅Costs $151 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
✅Delivers 148.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.1 vs 3.3 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 M280X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2010 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌25% higher power demand at 250W vs 200W.

Radeon R9 M280X

2013

Why buy it

✅4.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Draws 200W instead of 250W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
152.5% HIGHER MSRP
$250 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.3 vs 8.1 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R9 M280X is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 4.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.8% in PassMark G3D (814 vs 800), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon HD 5670 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 5670 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $151 cheaper on MSRP at $99 vs $250, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 148.2% (8.1 vs 3.3), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon R9 M280X still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Radeon HD 5670 vs Radeon R9 M280X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon HD 5670

The Radeon HD 5670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 880 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 800 points. Launch price was $369.

Radeon R9 M280X

The Radeon R9 M280X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 814 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 5670 scores 800 and the Radeon R9 M280X reaches 814 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 5670 is built on TeraScale 3 while the Radeon R9 M280X uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (Radeon HD 5670) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 M280X). Raw compute: 2.703 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 5670) vs 4.096 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M280X). Boost clocks: 880 MHz vs 1000 MHz.

Feature	Radeon HD 5670	Radeon R9 M280X
G3D Mark Score	800	814+2%
Architecture	TeraScale 3	GCN 1.0
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1536	2048+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.703 TFLOPS	4.096 TFLOPS+52%
Boost Clock	880 MHz	1000 MHz+14%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	96	128+33%
L1 Cache	192 KB	512 KB+167%
L2 Cache	512 KB	768 KB+50%
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon HD 5670	Radeon R9 M280X
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 5670 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M280X carries 4 GB. Radeon R9 M280X gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon HD 5670 and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M280X. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon HD 5670) vs 768 KB (Radeon R9 M280X) — the Radeon R9 M280X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon HD 5670	Radeon R9 M280X
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	80 GB/s
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB	768 KB+50%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 5670 draws 250W versus the Radeon R9 M280X's 200W — a 22.2% difference. The Radeon R9 M280X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 250W (Radeon HD 5670) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M280X). Power connectors: None vs Mobile.

Feature	Radeon HD 5670	Radeon R9 M280X
TDP	250W	200W-20%
Recommended PSU	250W-29%	350W
Power Connector	None	Mobile
Perf/Watt	3.2	4.1+28%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon HD 5670 came in at $99, while the Radeon R9 M280X launched at $250. On MSRP, Radeon HD 5670 was 60.4% cheaper ($151 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 8.1 (Radeon HD 5670) vs 3.3 (Radeon R9 M280X) — the Radeon HD 5670 offers 145.5% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 M280X (2013 vs 2010).

Feature	Radeon HD 5670	Radeon R9 M280X
MSRP	$99-60%	$250
Performance per Dollar	8.1+145%	3.3
Codename	Cayman	Tahiti
Release	December 14 2010	October 8 2013
Ranking	#596	#404

Search Radeon HD 5670 on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 M280X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.