Radeon HD 6670/7670 vs GRID M6-0B

Radeon HD 6670/7670

2012Core: 600 MHz

GRID M6-0B

2015Core: 722 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Radeon HD 6670/7670

946

+3.7%

Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8570M Dual

Radeon HD 7610M

Radeon HD 7550M/7650M

Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600

912

0.0%

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 6670/7670 is positioned at rank 374 and the GRID M6-0B is on rank 374, so the GRID M6-0B offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6670/7670

#364

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

1136%

#366

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

1029%

#367

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

1027%

#371

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

934%

#372

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

927%

#374

Radeon HD 6670/7670

MSRP: $99|Avg: $40

100%

#375

Radeon 620

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

100%

#376

Radeon R5 435

MSRP: $80|Avg: $80

100%

#377

Radeon R9 M470X

MSRP: $350|Avg: $350

97%

#379

Radeon R9 M380

MSRP: $300|Avg: $300

96%

#381

Radeon HD 7640G

MSRP: $50|Avg: $50

95%

#384

Radeon R7 M465

MSRP: $120|Avg: $35

92%

#386

GeForce GT 640M LE

MSRP: $80|Avg: $20

91%

#387

Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3450U

MSRP: $150|Avg: $40

91%

#388

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

MSRP: $200|Avg: $50

90%

#389

HD Graphics 520

MSRP: $100|Avg: $35

90%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GRID M6-0B

#358

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

24218%

#373

Quadro 6000

MSRP: $4399|Avg: $150

100%

#374

GRID M6-0B

MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100

100%

#375

RTXA5000-6Q

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $2500

100%

#376

GRID M10-1B

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $150

98%

#377

Tesla K40c

MSRP: $7699|Avg: $500

95%

#378

Quadro FX 4800

MSRP: $1799|Avg: $80

92%

#379

Tesla M2090

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $40

92%

#380

GRID K180Q

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $1000

87%

#381

GRID K2

MSRP: $5199|Avg: $80

87%

#382

Quadro CX

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $500

77%

#383

GRID P100-8Q

MSRP: $7374|Avg: $550

72%

#384

Quadro FX 550

MSRP: $150|Avg: $10

70%

#385

Quadro FX 350

MSRP: $199|Avg: $15

70%

#386

Tesla M2070

MSRP: $3099|Avg: $50

69%

#387

GRID V100D-8Q

MSRP: $10000|Avg: $10000

69%

#388

GRID M10-0Q

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $150

66%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon HD 6670/7670 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID M6-0B.

Insight	Radeon HD 6670/7670	GRID M6-0B
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+3.7%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.7%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon HD 6670/7670 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 6670/7670 holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $100), it costs 60% less, resulting in a 159.3% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Radeon HD 6670/7670	GRID M6-0B
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+159.3%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($40)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon HD 6670/7670 Benchmark Check

GRID M6-0B Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 6670/7670 and GRID M6-0B

Radeon HD 6670/7670

The Radeon HD 6670/7670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 5 2012. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 946 points.

GRID M6-0B

The GRID M6-0B is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 722 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 912 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 6670/7670 scores 946 and the GRID M6-0B reaches 912 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 6670/7670 is built on TeraScale 2 while the GRID M6-0B uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 480 (Radeon HD 6670/7670) vs 1,536 (GRID M6-0B). Raw compute: 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6670/7670) vs 2.218 TFLOPS (GRID M6-0B).

Feature	Radeon HD 6670/7670	GRID M6-0B
G3D Mark Score	946+4%	912
Architecture	TeraScale 2	Maxwell 2.0
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	480	1536+220%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.576 TFLOPS	2.218 TFLOPS+285%
ROPs	8	64+700%
TMUs	24	96+300%
L1 Cache	48 KB	576 KB+1100%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	2 MB+700%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon HD 6670/7670	GRID M6-0B
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 6670/7670) vs 2 MB (GRID M6-0B) — the GRID M6-0B has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon HD 6670/7670	GRID M6-0B
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	2 MB+700%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 6670/7670 draws 45W versus the GRID M6-0B's 100W — a 75.9% difference. The Radeon HD 6670/7670 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 6670/7670) vs 350W (GRID M6-0B). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Radeon HD 6670/7670	GRID M6-0B
TDP	45W-55%	100W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	—	1mm
Slots	—	0
Perf/Watt	21.0+131%	9.1

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon HD 6670/7670 launched at $99 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the GRID M6-0B launched at $1500 and now averages $100. The Radeon HD 6670/7670 costs 60% less ($60 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 23.6 (Radeon HD 6670/7670) vs 9.1 (GRID M6-0B) — the Radeon HD 6670/7670 offers 159.3% better value. The GRID M6-0B is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2012).