Radeon HD 6670/7670
VS
Radeon 620

Radeon HD 6670/7670 vs Radeon 620

AMD

Radeon HD 6670/7670

2012Core: 600 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon 620

2019Core: 730 MHzBoost: 1024 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 6670/7670 is positioned at rank 374 and the Radeon 620 is on rank 375, so the Radeon HD 6670/7670 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6670/7670

#364
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
1136%
#366
1029%
#367
1027%
#371
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
934%
#372
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
927%
#374
Radeon HD 6670/7670
MSRP: $99|Avg: $40
100%
#375
Radeon 620
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
100%
#376
Radeon R5 435
MSRP: $80|Avg: $80
100%
#377
Radeon R9 M470X
MSRP: $350|Avg: $350
97%
#379
Radeon R9 M380
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
96%
#381
Radeon HD 7640G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
95%
#384
Radeon R7 M465
MSRP: $120|Avg: $35
92%
#386
GeForce GT 640M LE
MSRP: $80|Avg: $20
91%
#387
Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3450U
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
91%
#388
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
90%
#389
HD Graphics 520
MSRP: $100|Avg: $35
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon 620

#365
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
1138%
#367
1032%
#368
1029%
#372
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
936%
#373
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
929%
#375
Radeon 620
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
100%
#376
Radeon R5 435
MSRP: $80|Avg: $80
100%
#377
Radeon R9 M470X
MSRP: $350|Avg: $350
97%
#379
Radeon R9 M380
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
96%
#380
Radeon HD 7640G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
95%
#384
Radeon R7 M465
MSRP: $120|Avg: $35
93%
#386
GeForce GT 640M LE
MSRP: $80|Avg: $20
91%
#387
Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3450U
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
91%
#388
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
90%
#389
HD Graphics 520
MSRP: $100|Avg: $35
90%
#390
Radeon HD 8600/8700M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon 620 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2012). The Radeon 620 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 6670/7670 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon 620 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 6670/7670.

InsightRadeon HD 6670/7670Radeon 620
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%)
Leading raw performance (+0.8%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) (28nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon HD 6670/7670 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $40 versus $50 for the Radeon 620, it costs 20% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 24% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon HD 6670/7670Radeon 620
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+24%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($40)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 6670/7670 and Radeon 620

AMD

Radeon HD 6670/7670

The Radeon HD 6670/7670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 5 2012. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 946 points.

AMD

Radeon 620

The Radeon 620 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 954 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 6670/7670 scores 946 and the Radeon 620 reaches 954 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 6670/7670 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon 620 uses GCN 3.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 480 (Radeon HD 6670/7670) vs 384 (Radeon 620). Raw compute: 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6670/7670) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon 620).

FeatureRadeon HD 6670/7670Radeon 620
G3D Mark Score
946
954
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GCN 3.0
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
480+25%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.576 TFLOPS
0.7864 TFLOPS+37%
ROPs
8
8
TMUs
24
24
L1 Cache
48 KB
96 KB+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB+100%
128 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 6670/7670Radeon 620
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon HD 6670/7670) vs 128 KB (Radeon 620) — the Radeon HD 6670/7670 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon HD 6670/7670Radeon 620
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB+100%
128 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 6670/7670 draws 45W versus the Radeon 620's 50W — a 10.5% difference. The Radeon HD 6670/7670 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 6670/7670) vs 350W (Radeon 620). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon HD 6670/7670Radeon 620
TDP
45W-10%
50W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt
21.0+10%
19.1
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon HD 6670/7670 launched at $99 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the Radeon 620 launched at $100 and now averages $50. The Radeon HD 6670/7670 costs 20% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 23.6 (Radeon HD 6670/7670) vs 19.1 (Radeon 620) — the Radeon HD 6670/7670 offers 23.6% better value. The Radeon 620 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2012).

FeatureRadeon HD 6670/7670Radeon 620
MSRP
$99-1%
$100
Avg Price (30d)
$40-20%
$50
Performance per Dollar
23.6+24%
19.1
Codename
Turks
Polaris 24
Release
January 5 2012
May 13 2019
Ranking
#870
#898