Radeon HD 6670/7670
VS
Quadro 2000D

Radeon HD 6670/7670 vs Quadro 2000D

AMD

Radeon HD 6670/7670

2012Core: 600 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro 2000D

2011Core: 625 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 6670/7670 is positioned at rank 374 and the Quadro 2000D is on rank 311, so the Quadro 2000D offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6670/7670

#364
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
1136%
#366
1029%
#367
1027%
#371
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
934%
#372
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
927%
#374
Radeon HD 6670/7670
MSRP: $99|Avg: $40
100%
#375
Radeon 620
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
100%
#376
Radeon R5 435
MSRP: $80|Avg: $80
100%
#377
Radeon R9 M470X
MSRP: $350|Avg: $350
97%
#379
Radeon R9 M380
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
96%
#381
Radeon HD 7640G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
95%
#384
Radeon R7 M465
MSRP: $120|Avg: $35
92%
#386
GeForce GT 640M LE
MSRP: $80|Avg: $20
91%
#387
Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3450U
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
91%
#388
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
90%
#389
HD Graphics 520
MSRP: $100|Avg: $35
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro 2000D

#116
Radeon Pro SSG
MSRP: $6999|Avg: $1500
96%
#296
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
9008%
#311
Quadro 2000D
MSRP: $599|Avg: $40
100%
#312
FirePro 3D V8800
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $30
99%
#313
Quadro K5000
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $60
98%
#314
Quadro 2000
MSRP: $599|Avg: $25
96%
#315
FirePro S7150
MSRP: $2399|Avg: $459
96%
#317
FirePro W9000
MSRP: $3999|Avg: $150
94%
#318
GRID M60-4Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120
93%
#319
FirePro V8800
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $100
93%
#320
Quadro K6000
MSRP: $5265|Avg: $300
93%
#321
NVS 510
MSRP: $449|Avg: $15
92%
#322
GRID M60-1Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $50
90%
#323
FirePro M2000
MSRP: $300|Avg: $50
87%
#324
GRID K280Q
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $50
87%
#325
Tesla K20c
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $500
85%
#326
GRID M6-1Q
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100
84%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro 2000D is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.6% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 6670/7670.

InsightRadeon HD 6670/7670Quadro 2000D
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-3.6%)
Leading raw performance (+3.6%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+700%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The Quadro 2000D offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro 2000D holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $40), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 3.6% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon HD 6670/7670Quadro 2000D
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+3.6%)
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 6670/7670 and Quadro 2000D

AMD

Radeon HD 6670/7670

The Radeon HD 6670/7670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 5 2012. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 946 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro 2000D

The Quadro 2000D is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 5 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 62W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 980 points. Launch price was $599.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 6670/7670 scores 946 and the Quadro 2000D reaches 980 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 6670/7670 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Quadro 2000D uses Fermi, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 480 (Radeon HD 6670/7670) vs 192 (Quadro 2000D). Raw compute: 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6670/7670) vs 0.48 TFLOPS (Quadro 2000D).

FeatureRadeon HD 6670/7670Quadro 2000D
G3D Mark Score
946
980+4%
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Fermi
Process Node
40 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
480+150%
192
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.576 TFLOPS+20%
0.48 TFLOPS
ROPs
8
16+100%
TMUs
24
32+33%
L1 Cache
48 KB
256 KB+433%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 6670/7670Quadro 2000D
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 6670/7670 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro 2000D has 4 GB. The Quadro 2000D offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.

FeatureRadeon HD 6670/7670Quadro 2000D
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
4 GB+700%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 6670/7670 draws 45W versus the Quadro 2000D's 62W — a 31.8% difference. The Radeon HD 6670/7670 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 6670/7670) vs 350W (Quadro 2000D). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon HD 6670/7670Quadro 2000D
TDP
45W-27%
62W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt
21.0+33%
15.8
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon HD 6670/7670 launched at $99 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the Quadro 2000D launched at $599 and now averages $40. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 23.6 (Radeon HD 6670/7670) vs 24.5 (Quadro 2000D) — the Quadro 2000D offers 3.8% better value. The Radeon HD 6670/7670 is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2011).

FeatureRadeon HD 6670/7670Quadro 2000D
MSRP
$99-83%
$599
Avg Price (30d)
$40
$40
Performance per Dollar
23.6
24.5+4%
Codename
Turks
GF106
Release
January 5 2012
October 5 2011
Ranking
#870
#892