Radeon HD 6750 vs GeForce 920MX
Radeon HD 6750
Popular choices:
GeForce 920MX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 6750 is positioned at rank 133 and the GeForce 920MX is on rank 360, so the Radeon HD 6750 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6750
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 920MX
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 920MX is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon HD 6750 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon HD 6750 | GeForce 920MX |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 920MX offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 920MX holds the technical lead. Priced at $54 (vs $109), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 105.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 6750 | GeForce 920MX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+105.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($109) | ✅More affordable ($54) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 6750 and GeForce 920MX
Radeon HD 6750
The Radeon HD 6750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 21 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The boost clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 720 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 86W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,046 points. Launch price was $49.99.
GeForce 920MX
The GeForce 920MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 25 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 965 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 16W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,064 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 6750 scores 1,046 and the GeForce 920MX reaches 1,064 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 6750 is built on TeraScale 2 while the GeForce 920MX uses Maxwell, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 720 (Radeon HD 6750) vs 256 (GeForce 920MX). Raw compute: 1.008 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6750) vs 0.5084 TFLOPS (GeForce 920MX). Boost clocks: 900 MHz vs 993 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6750 | GeForce 920MX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,046 | 1,064+2% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 720+181% | 256 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.008 TFLOPS+98% | 0.5084 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | 993 MHz+10% |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 36+50% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 72 KB | 128 KB+78% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 6750 | GeForce 920MX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 6750 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce 920MX has 512 MB. The Radeon HD 6750 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 6750) vs 1 MB (GeForce 920MX) — the GeForce 920MX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6750 | GeForce 920MX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.2 (11_0) (Radeon HD 6750) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce 920MX). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6750 | GeForce 920MX |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (11_0)+7% |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6+5% |
| Max Displays | 3 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (Radeon HD 6750) vs None (GeForce 920MX). Decoder: UVD 2.2 vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 6750) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce 920MX).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6750 | GeForce 920MX |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | None |
| Decoder | UVD 2.2 | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 6750 draws 86W versus the GeForce 920MX's 16W — a 137.3% difference. The GeForce 920MX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon HD 6750) vs 350W (GeForce 920MX). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6750 | GeForce 920MX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 86W | 16W-81% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 350W-22% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 170mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 12.2 | 66.5+445% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 6750 launched at $109 MSRP and currently averages $109, while the GeForce 920MX launched at $100 and now averages $54. The GeForce 920MX costs 50.5% less ($55 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 9.6 (Radeon HD 6750) vs 19.7 (GeForce 920MX) — the GeForce 920MX offers 105.2% better value. The GeForce 920MX is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6750 | GeForce 920MX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $109 | $100-8% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $109 | $54-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.6 | 19.7+105% |
| Codename | Juniper | GM108 |
| Release | January 21 2011 | March 25 2016 |
| Ranking | #872 | #864 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HD 6750 and GeForce 920MX
