CPU
GPU
Radeon HD 6750
Popular choices:
Radeon 530
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon HD 6750 is positioned at rank #133 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6750
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon 530 is significantly newer (2017 vs 2011). The Radeon 530 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 6750 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 6750 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon 530.
| Insight | Radeon HD 6750 | Radeon 530 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon 530 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon 530 holds the technical lead. Priced at $49 (vs $109), it costs 55% less, resulting in a 120.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 6750 | Radeon 530 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+120.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($109) | ✅More affordable ($49) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 6750 and Radeon 530
Radeon HD 6750
The Radeon HD 6750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 21 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The boost clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 720 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 86W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,046 points. Launch price was $49.99.
Radeon 530
The Radeon 530 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,037 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 6750 scores 1,046 and the Radeon 530 reaches 1,037 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 6750 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon 530 uses GCN 3.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 720 (Radeon HD 6750) vs 384 (Radeon 530). Raw compute: 1.008 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6750) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon 530). Boost clocks: 900 MHz vs 1024 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6750 | Radeon 530 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,046 | 1,037 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 720+88% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.008 TFLOPS+28% | 0.7864 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | 1024 MHz+14% |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 36+50% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 72 KB | 96 KB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB+100% | 128 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 6750 | Radeon 530 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 6750 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 530 has 512 MB. The Radeon HD 6750 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon HD 6750) vs 128 KB (Radeon 530) — the Radeon HD 6750 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6750 | Radeon 530 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB+100% | 128 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.2 (11_0) (Radeon HD 6750) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon 530). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6750 | Radeon 530 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (12_0)+7% |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6+5% |
| Max Displays | 3 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (Radeon HD 6750) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon 530). Decoder: UVD 2.2 vs UVD 6.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 6750) vs H.264,H.265 (Decode),VC-1,MPEG-4 (Radeon 530).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6750 | Radeon 530 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 2.2 | UVD 6.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,H.265 (Decode),VC-1,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 6750 draws 86W versus the Radeon 530's 50W — a 52.9% difference. The Radeon 530 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon HD 6750) vs 350W (Radeon 530). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 170mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 75.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6750 | Radeon 530 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 86W | 50W-42% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 350W-22% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 170mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 12.2 | 20.7+70% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 6750 launched at $109 MSRP and currently averages $109, while the Radeon 530 launched at $0 and now averages $49. The Radeon 530 costs 55% less ($60 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 9.6 (Radeon HD 6750) vs 21.2 (Radeon 530) — the Radeon 530 offers 120.8% better value. The Radeon 530 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6750 | Radeon 530 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $109 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $109 | $49-55% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.6 | 21.2+121% |
| Codename | Juniper | Weston |
| Release | January 21 2011 | April 18 2017 |
| Ranking | #872 | #873 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HD 6750 and Radeon 530
