Radeon HD 6750 vs Radeon R7 M465
Radeon HD 6750
Popular choices:
Radeon R7 M465
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 6750 is positioned at rank 133 and the Radeon R7 M465 is on rank 384, so the Radeon HD 6750 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6750
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 M465
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R7 M465 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon HD 6750 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon HD 6750 | Radeon R7 M465 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R7 M465 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R7 M465 holds the technical lead. Priced at $35 (vs $109), it costs 68% less, resulting in a 215.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 6750 | Radeon R7 M465 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+215.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($109) | ✅More affordable ($35) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 6750 and Radeon R7 M465
Radeon HD 6750
The Radeon HD 6750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 21 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The boost clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 720 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 86W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,046 points. Launch price was $49.99.
Radeon R7 M465
The Radeon R7 M465 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1125 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,059 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 6750 scores 1,046 and the Radeon R7 M465 reaches 1,059 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 6750 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon R7 M465 uses GCN 3.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 720 (Radeon HD 6750) vs 384 (Radeon R7 M465). Raw compute: 1.008 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6750) vs 0.864 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M465). Boost clocks: 900 MHz vs 1125 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6750 | Radeon R7 M465 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,046 | 1,059+1% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 720+88% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.008 TFLOPS+17% | 0.864 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | 1125 MHz+25% |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 36+50% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 72 KB | 96 KB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB+100% | 128 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 6750 | Radeon R7 M465 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 6750 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 M465 has 512 MB. The Radeon HD 6750 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon HD 6750) vs 128 KB (Radeon R7 M465) — the Radeon HD 6750 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6750 | Radeon R7 M465 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB+100% | 128 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.2 (11_0) (Radeon HD 6750) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon R7 M465). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6750 | Radeon R7 M465 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (11_1)+7% |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5+2% |
| Max Displays | 3+50% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (Radeon HD 6750) vs VCE 3.1 (Radeon R7 M465). Decoder: UVD 2.2 vs UVD 6.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 6750) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Radeon R7 M465).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6750 | Radeon R7 M465 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | VCE 3.1 |
| Decoder | UVD 2.2 | UVD 6.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 6750 draws 86W versus the Radeon R7 M465's 75W — a 13.7% difference. The Radeon R7 M465 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon HD 6750) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M465). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6750 | Radeon R7 M465 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 86W | 75W-13% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 350W-22% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 170mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 12.2 | 14.1+16% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 6750 launched at $109 MSRP and currently averages $109, while the Radeon R7 M465 launched at $120 and now averages $35. The Radeon R7 M465 costs 67.9% less ($74 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 9.6 (Radeon HD 6750) vs 30.3 (Radeon R7 M465) — the Radeon R7 M465 offers 215.6% better value. The Radeon R7 M465 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6750 | Radeon R7 M465 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $109-9% | $120 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $109 | $35-68% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.6 | 30.3+216% |
| Codename | Juniper | Topaz |
| Release | January 21 2011 | May 15 2016 |
| Ranking | #872 | #867 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HD 6750 and Radeon R7 M465
