GeForce 920MX vs Radeon HD 6750

CPU

GPU

GeForce 920MX

2016Core: 965 MHzBoost: 993 MHz

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Radeon HD 6750

2011Boost: 900 MHz

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

GeForce 920MX vs Radeon HD 6750 Performance Spectrum

GeForce 920MX

0.5 GB 16

1,064

+1.7%

GeForce GTX 1070 (móvel)

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

GeForce RTX 4060

Radeon HD 6750

1 GB 86

1,046

0.0%

Radeon R7 M360

Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M

Radeon R9 M280X

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 920MX vs Radeon HD 6750 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 920MX vs Radeon HD 6750: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 920MX

2016

Why buy it

✅33.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $9 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
✅Delivers 10.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.6 vs 9.6 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
✅Draws 16W instead of 86W, a 70W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon HD 6750

2011

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 920MX across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2011 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
9% HIGHER MSRP
$109 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.6 vs 10.6 G3D/$ ($109 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
❌437.5% higher power demand at 86W vs 16W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce 920MX is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 33.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.7% in PassMark G3D (1,064 vs 1,046), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 920MX is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2016 generation instead of 2011. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce 920MX makes the most sense to buy today. It is $9 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $109, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 10.9% (10.6 vs 9.6), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce 920MX vs Radeon HD 6750 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 920MX

The GeForce 920MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 25 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 965 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 16W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,064 points.

Radeon HD 6750

The Radeon HD 6750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 21 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The boost clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 720 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 86W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,046 points. Launch price was $49.99.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 920MX scores 1,064 and the Radeon HD 6750 reaches 1,046 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 920MX is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 6750 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 256 (GeForce 920MX) vs 720 (Radeon HD 6750). Raw compute: 0.5084 TFLOPS (GeForce 920MX) vs 1.008 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6750). Boost clocks: 993 MHz vs 900 MHz.

Feature	GeForce 920MX	Radeon HD 6750
G3D Mark Score	1,064+2%	1,046
Architecture	Maxwell	TeraScale 2
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	256	720+181%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.5084 TFLOPS	1.008 TFLOPS+98%
Boost Clock	993 MHz+10%	900 MHz
ROPs	8	16+100%
TMUs	24	36+50%
L1 Cache	128 KB+78%	72 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 920MX gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 6750 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce 920MX	Radeon HD 6750
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 920MX has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6750 carries 1 GB. Radeon HD 6750 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 920MX and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6750. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 920MX) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 6750) — the GeForce 920MX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 920MX	Radeon HD 6750
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	1 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce 920MX) vs 11.2 (11_0) (Radeon HD 6750). Vulkan: 1.1 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 3.

Feature	GeForce 920MX	Radeon HD 6750
DirectX	12 (11_0)+7%	11.2 (11_0)
Vulkan	1.1	N/A
OpenGL	4.6+5%	4.4
Max Displays	0	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 920MX) vs None (Radeon HD 6750). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs UVD 2.2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce 920MX) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 6750).

Feature	GeForce 920MX	Radeon HD 6750
Encoder	None	None
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP6	UVD 2.2
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 920MX draws 16W versus the Radeon HD 6750's 86W — a 137.3% difference. The GeForce 920MX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 920MX) vs 450W (Radeon HD 6750). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	GeForce 920MX	Radeon HD 6750
TDP	16W-81%	86W
Recommended PSU	350W-22%	450W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	—	170mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	—	2
Temp (Load)	—	75
Perf/Watt	66.5+445%	12.2

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 920MX came in at $100, while the Radeon HD 6750 launched at $109. On MSRP, GeForce 920MX was 8.3% cheaper ($9 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 10.6 (GeForce 920MX) vs 9.6 (Radeon HD 6750) — the GeForce 920MX offers 10.4% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 920MX (2016 vs 2011).

Feature	GeForce 920MX	Radeon HD 6750
MSRP	$100-8%	$109
Performance per Dollar	10.6+10%	9.6
Codename	GM108	Juniper
Release	March 25 2016	January 21 2011
Ranking	#864	#872

Search GeForce 920MX on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 6750 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.