
Radeon HD 6750

Radeon HD 8600/8700M
Radeon HD 6750 vs Radeon HD 8600/8700M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon HD 6750 vs Radeon HD 8600/8700M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon HD 6750 vs Radeon HD 8600/8700M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon HD 6750
2011Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($109 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 8600/8700M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2011 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌72% higher power demand at 86W vs 50W.
Radeon HD 8600/8700M
2013Why buy it
- ✅17.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 86W, a 36W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 6750 vs Radeon HD 8600/8700M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon HD 6750
The Radeon HD 6750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 21 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The boost clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 720 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 86W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,046 points. Launch price was $49.99.

Radeon HD 8600/8700M
The Radeon HD 8600/8700M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 775 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,030 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 6750 scores 1,046 and the Radeon HD 8600/8700M reaches 1,030 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 6750 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon HD 8600/8700M uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 720 (Radeon HD 6750) vs 640 (Radeon HD 8600/8700M). Raw compute: 1.008 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6750) vs 0.992 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8600/8700M). Boost clocks: 900 MHz vs 775 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6750 | Radeon HD 8600/8700M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,046+2% | 1,030 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 720+13% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.008 TFLOPS+2% | 0.992 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz+16% | 775 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 36 | 40+11% |
| L1 Cache | 72 KB | 160 KB+122% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 6750 | Radeon HD 8600/8700M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 6750 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8600/8700M carries 512 MB. Radeon HD 6750 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6750 and System on the Radeon HD 8600/8700M.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6750 | Radeon HD 8600/8700M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 6750 draws 86W versus the Radeon HD 8600/8700M's 50W — a 52.9% difference. The Radeon HD 8600/8700M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon HD 6750) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8600/8700M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6750 | Radeon HD 8600/8700M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 86W | 50W-42% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 350W-22% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 170mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 12.2 | 20.6+69% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon HD 8600/8700M (2013 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6750 | Radeon HD 8600/8700M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $109 | — |
| Codename | Juniper | Venus |
| Release | January 21 2011 | April 1 2013 |
| Ranking | #872 | #745 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















