Radeon HD 6750 vs Radeon R7 250
Radeon HD 6750
Popular choices:
Radeon R7 250
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 6750 is positioned at rank 133 and the Radeon R7 250 is on rank 107, so the Radeon R7 250 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6750
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 250
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R7 250 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (2 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 6750.
| Insight | Radeon HD 6750 | Radeon R7 250 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R7 250 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R7 250 holds the technical lead. Priced at $25 (vs $109), it costs 77% less, resulting in a 338.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 6750 | Radeon R7 250 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+338.1%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($109) | ✅More affordable ($25) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 6750 and Radeon R7 250
Radeon HD 6750
The Radeon HD 6750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 21 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The boost clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 720 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 86W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,046 points. Launch price was $49.99.
Radeon R7 250
The Radeon R7 250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,051 points. Launch price was $89.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 6750 scores 1,046 and the Radeon R7 250 reaches 1,051 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 6750 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon R7 250 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 720 (Radeon HD 6750) vs 384 (Radeon R7 250). Raw compute: 1.008 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6750) vs 0.8064 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 250). Boost clocks: 900 MHz vs 1050 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6750 | Radeon R7 250 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,046 | 1,051 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 720+88% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.008 TFLOPS+25% | 0.8064 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | 1050 MHz+17% |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 36+50% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 72 KB | 96 KB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 6750 | Radeon R7 250 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 6750 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 250 has 2 GB. The Radeon R7 250 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6750 | Radeon R7 250 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 2 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.2 (11_0) (Radeon HD 6750) vs 11.1 (Radeon R7 250). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6750 | Radeon R7 250 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 11.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6+5% |
| Max Displays | 3+50% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (Radeon HD 6750) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R7 250). Decoder: UVD 2.2 vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 6750) vs MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4 (Radeon R7 250).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6750 | Radeon R7 250 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 2.2 | UVD 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 6750 draws 86W versus the Radeon R7 250's 65W — a 27.8% difference. The Radeon R7 250 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon HD 6750) vs 300W (Radeon R7 250). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None. Card length: 170mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 75.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6750 | Radeon R7 250 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 86W | 65W-24% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 300W-33% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Length | 170mm | 168mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 12.2 | 16.2+33% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 6750 launched at $109 MSRP and currently averages $109, while the Radeon R7 250 launched at $89 and now averages $25. The Radeon R7 250 costs 77.1% less ($84 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 9.6 (Radeon HD 6750) vs 42.0 (Radeon R7 250) — the Radeon R7 250 offers 337.5% better value. The Radeon R7 250 is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6750 | Radeon R7 250 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $109 | $89-18% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $109 | $25-77% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.6 | 42.0+338% |
| Codename | Juniper | Oland |
| Release | January 21 2011 | October 8 2013 |
| Ranking | #872 | #871 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HD 6750 and Radeon R7 250
