G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon HD 6750 vs Radeon R7 250 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon HD 6750 vs Radeon R7 250: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon HD 6750

2011

Why buy it

✅1.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2011 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
22.5% HIGHER MSRP
$109 MSRPvs$89 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.6 vs 11.8 G3D/$ ($109 MSRP vs $89 MSRP).
❌32.3% higher power demand at 86W vs 65W.

Radeon R7 250

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $20 less on MSRP ($89 MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
✅Delivers 23.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.8 vs 9.6 G3D/$ ($89 MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
✅Draws 65W instead of 86W, a 21W reduction.
✅Measures 168mm instead of 170mm, a 2mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 6750 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 6750 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 1.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R7 250 instead at 1,051 vs 1,046, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon HD 6750 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R7 250 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $20 cheaper on MSRP at $89 vs $109, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 23.1% (11.8 vs 9.6), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R7 250 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon HD 6750 has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon HD 6750 vs Radeon R7 250 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon HD 6750

The Radeon HD 6750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 21 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The boost clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 720 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 86W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,046 points. Launch price was $49.99.

Radeon R7 250

The Radeon R7 250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,051 points. Launch price was $89.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 6750 scores 1,046 and the Radeon R7 250 reaches 1,051 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 6750 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon R7 250 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 720 (Radeon HD 6750) vs 384 (Radeon R7 250). Raw compute: 1.008 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6750) vs 0.8064 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 250). Boost clocks: 900 MHz vs 1050 MHz.

Feature	Radeon HD 6750	Radeon R7 250
G3D Mark Score	1,046	1,051
Architecture	TeraScale 2	GCN 1.0
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	720+88%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.008 TFLOPS+25%	0.8064 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	900 MHz	1050 MHz+17%
ROPs	16+100%	8
TMUs	36+50%	24
L1 Cache	72 KB	96 KB+33%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon HD 6750	Radeon R7 250
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 6750 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 250 carries 2 GB. Radeon R7 250 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6750 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 250.

Feature	Radeon HD 6750	Radeon R7 250
VRAM Capacity	1 GB	2 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.2 (11_0) (Radeon HD 6750) vs 11.1 (Radeon R7 250). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.

Feature	Radeon HD 6750	Radeon R7 250
DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	11.1
Vulkan	N/A	1.2
OpenGL	4.4	4.6+5%
Max Displays	3+50%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (Radeon HD 6750) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R7 250). Decoder: UVD 2.2 vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 6750) vs MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4 (Radeon R7 250).

Feature	Radeon HD 6750	Radeon R7 250
Encoder	None	VCE 1.0
Decoder	UVD 2.2	UVD 4.0
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 6750 draws 86W versus the Radeon R7 250's 65W — a 27.8% difference. The Radeon R7 250 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon HD 6750) vs 300W (Radeon R7 250). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None. Card length: 170mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 75.

Feature	Radeon HD 6750	Radeon R7 250
TDP	86W	65W-24%
Recommended PSU	450W	300W-33%
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	None
Length	170mm	168mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	75	75
Perf/Watt	12.2	16.2+33%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon HD 6750 came in at $109, while the Radeon R7 250 launched at $89. On MSRP, Radeon R7 250 was 18.3% cheaper ($20 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.6 (Radeon HD 6750) vs 11.8 (Radeon R7 250) — the Radeon R7 250 offers 22.9% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 250 (2013 vs 2011).

Feature	Radeon HD 6750	Radeon R7 250
MSRP	$109	$89-18%
Performance per Dollar	9.6	11.8+23%
Codename	Juniper	Oland
Release	January 21 2011	October 8 2013
Ranking	#872	#871

Search Radeon HD 6750 on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 250 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.