CPU
GPU
Radeon HD 6750M
Popular choices:
Quadro 2000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 6750M is positioned at rank 236 and the Quadro 2000 is on rank 314, so the Radeon HD 6750M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6750M
Performance Per Dollar Quadro 2000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro 2000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 6750M.
| Insight | Radeon HD 6750M | Quadro 2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro 2000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro 2000 holds the technical lead. Priced at $25 (vs $60), it costs 58% less, resulting in a 142.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 6750M | Quadro 2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+142.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($60) | ✅More affordable ($25) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 6750M and Quadro 2000
Radeon HD 6750M
The Radeon HD 6750M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 937 points.
Quadro 2000
The Quadro 2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 24 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 62W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 948 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 6750M scores 937 and the Quadro 2000 reaches 948 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 6750M is built on TeraScale 2 while the Quadro 2000 uses Fermi, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 480 (Radeon HD 6750M) vs 192 (Quadro 2000). Raw compute: 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6750M) vs 0.48 TFLOPS (Quadro 2000).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6750M | Quadro 2000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 937 | 948+1% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Fermi |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 480+150% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.576 TFLOPS+20% | 0.48 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 32+33% |
| L1 Cache | 48 KB | 256 KB+433% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 6750M | Quadro 2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 1 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6750M | Quadro 2000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 6750M draws 35W versus the Quadro 2000's 62W — a 55.7% difference. The Radeon HD 6750M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 6750M) vs 350W (Quadro 2000). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6750M | Quadro 2000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35W-44% | 62W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 178mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Perf/Watt | 26.8+75% | 15.3 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro 2000 costs 58.3% less ($35 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 15.6 (Radeon HD 6750M) vs 37.9 (Quadro 2000) — the Quadro 2000 offers 142.9% better value. The Radeon HD 6750M is the newer GPU (2011 vs 2010).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6750M | Quadro 2000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $599 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $60 | $25-58% |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.6 | 37.9+143% |
| Codename | Whistler | GF106 |
| Release | January 4 2011 | December 24 2010 |
| Ranking | #905 | #902 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HD 6750M and Quadro 2000
