Radeon HD 6750M
VS
Quadro CX

Radeon HD 6750M vs Quadro CX

AMD

Radeon HD 6750M

2011Core: 600 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro CX

2008Core: 602 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 6750M is positioned at rank 236 and the Quadro CX is on rank 383, so the Radeon HD 6750M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6750M

#54
Radeon RX 6800S
MSRP: $800|Avg: $800
93%
#226
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
510%
#228
462%
#229
461%
#233
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
419%
#234
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
416%
#236
Radeon HD 6750M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $60
100%
#237
Radeon HD 7570M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $15
99%
#239
GeForce MX570 A
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
97%
#240
Arc Graphics 130T
MSRP: $300|Avg: $250
97%
#242
GeForce GT 645
MSRP: $99|Avg: $15
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro CX

#368
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
31432%
#383
Quadro CX
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $500
100%
#384
GRID P100-8Q
MSRP: $7374|Avg: $550
94%
#385
Quadro FX 550
MSRP: $150|Avg: $10
91%
#386
Quadro FX 350
MSRP: $199|Avg: $15
91%
#387
GRID V100D-8Q
MSRP: $10000|Avg: $10000
89%
#388
Tesla M2070
MSRP: $3099|Avg: $50
89%
#389
GRID M10-0Q
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $150
85%
#390
Quadro FX 560
MSRP: $299|Avg: $15
81%
#391
GRID V100-2Q
MSRP: $10000|Avg: $2000
81%
#392
Quadro FX 5800
MSRP: $3499|Avg: $40
74%
#393
RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q
MSRP: $8565|Avg: $8565
68%
#394
FireStream 9170
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $20
68%
#395
Quadro FX 1700
MSRP: $699|Avg: $500
66%
#396
GRID P40-6Q
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150
64%
#397
Quadro FX 540
MSRP: $299|Avg: $15
57%
#398
Quadro 7000
MSRP: $14499|Avg: $300
51%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro CX is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (4 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 6750M.

InsightRadeon HD 6750MQuadro CX
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%)
Leading raw performance (+1.1%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+300%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
Standard Size (267mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon HD 6750M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 6750M holds the technical lead. Priced at $60 (vs $500), it costs 88% less, resulting in a 724.5% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon HD 6750MQuadro CX
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+724.5%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($60)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 6750M and Quadro CX

AMD

Radeon HD 6750M

The Radeon HD 6750M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 937 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro CX

The Quadro CX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 947 points. Launch price was $1,999.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 6750M scores 937 and the Quadro CX reaches 947 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 6750M is built on TeraScale 2 while the Quadro CX uses Tesla 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 480 (Radeon HD 6750M) vs 192 (Quadro CX). Raw compute: 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6750M) vs 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro CX).

FeatureRadeon HD 6750MQuadro CX
G3D Mark Score
937
947+1%
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Tesla 2.0
Process Node
40 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
480+150%
192
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.576 TFLOPS+25%
0.4623 TFLOPS
ROPs
8
24+200%
TMUs
24
64+167%
L2 Cache
256 KB+33%
192 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 6750MQuadro CX
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 6750M comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro CX has 4 GB. The Quadro CX offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon HD 6750M) vs 192 KB (Quadro CX) — the Radeon HD 6750M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon HD 6750MQuadro CX
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
4 GB+300%
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Bus Width
System
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB+33%
192 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 6750M draws 35W versus the Quadro CX's 150W — a 124.3% difference. The Radeon HD 6750M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 6750M) vs 350W (Quadro CX). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon HD 6750MQuadro CX
TDP
35W-77%
150W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
267mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
80
Perf/Watt
26.8+325%
6.3
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon HD 6750M costs 88% less ($440 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 15.6 (Radeon HD 6750M) vs 1.9 (Quadro CX) — the Radeon HD 6750M offers 721.1% better value. The Radeon HD 6750M is the newer GPU (2011 vs 2008).

FeatureRadeon HD 6750MQuadro CX
MSRP
$1999
Avg Price (30d)
$60-88%
$500
Performance per Dollar
15.6+721%
1.9
Codename
Whistler
GT200B
Release
January 4 2011
November 11 2008
Ranking
#905
#901