
Radeon HD 6900M vs Radeon HD 7750

Radeon HD 6900M
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 7750
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon HD 6900M is positioned at rank #347 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6900M
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 6900M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon HD 7750 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon HD 6900M | Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+700%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon HD 6900M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 6900M and Radeon HD 7750

Radeon HD 6900M
The Radeon HD 6900M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 680 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,707 points.

Radeon HD 7750
The Radeon HD 7750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 15 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,703 points. Launch price was $109.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 6900M scores 1,707 and the Radeon HD 7750 reaches 1,703 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 6900M is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon HD 7750 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 960 (Radeon HD 6900M) vs 512 (Radeon HD 7750). Raw compute: 1.306 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6900M) vs 0.8192 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7750).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6900M | Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,707 | 1,703 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 960+88% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.306 TFLOPS+59% | 0.8192 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 48+50% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB+50% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 6900M | Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 6900M comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7750 has 4 GB. The Radeon HD 7750 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon HD 6900M) vs 256 KB (Radeon HD 7750) — the Radeon HD 6900M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6900M | Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 4 GB+700% |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 72 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 6900M draws 75W versus the Radeon HD 7750's 55W — a 30.8% difference. The Radeon HD 7750 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 6900M) vs 300W (Radeon HD 7750). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6900M | Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 55W-27% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Length | — | 168mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 60°C |
| Perf/Watt | 22.8 | 31.0+36% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 7750 is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6900M | Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $109 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $30 |
| Codename | Blackcomb | Cape Verde |
| Release | January 4 2011 | February 15 2012 |
| Ranking | #654 | #731 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















