Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs Radeon HD 6900M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6900M

#337

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

954%

#339

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

865%

#340

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

863%

#344

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

784%

#345

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

779%

#347

Radeon HD 6900M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#348

GeForce MX350

MSRP: $250|Avg: $200

99%

#349

GeForce 840A

MSRP: $100|Avg: $25

98%

#350

Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition

MSRP: $450|Avg: $450

98%

#351

HD Graphics 630

MSRP: $100|Avg: $30

98%

#354

Radeon R7 M370

MSRP: $130|Avg: $40

96%

#357

Radeon 625

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

95%

#359

Radeon R7 M350

MSRP: $100|Avg: $100

94%

#360

GeForce 920MX

MSRP: $100|Avg: $54

93%

#361

Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H

MSRP: $150|Avg: $45

93%

#362

Radeon HD 7670A

MSRP: $100|Avg: $40

92%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Iris Plus Graphics 655 is significantly newer (2018 vs 2011). The Iris Plus Graphics 655 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 6900M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Iris Plus Graphics 655 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon HD 6900M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Iris Plus Graphics 655	Radeon HD 6900M
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+1.3%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.3%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Iris Plus Graphics 655 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Iris Plus Graphics 655 Benchmark Check

Radeon HD 6900M Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Radeon HD 6900M

Iris Plus Graphics 655

The Iris Plus Graphics 655 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in April 3 2018. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,729 points.

Radeon HD 6900M

The Radeon HD 6900M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 680 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,707 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Iris Plus Graphics 655 scores 1,729 and the Radeon HD 6900M reaches 1,707 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Plus Graphics 655 is built on Generation 9.5 while the Radeon HD 6900M uses TeraScale 2, both on 14 nm+++ vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (Iris Plus Graphics 655) vs 960 (Radeon HD 6900M). Raw compute: 0.8064 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics 655) vs 1.306 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6900M).

Feature	Iris Plus Graphics 655	Radeon HD 6900M
G3D Mark Score	1,729+1%	1,707
Architecture	Generation 9.5	TeraScale 2
Process Node	14 nm+++	40 nm
Shading Units	384	960+150%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.8064 TFLOPS	1.306 TFLOPS+62%
ROPs	6	32+433%
TMUs	48	48

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Iris Plus Graphics 655	Radeon HD 6900M
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Iris Plus Graphics 655 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6900M has 512 MB. The Radeon HD 6900M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs System.

Feature	Iris Plus Graphics 655	Radeon HD 6900M
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	0.5 GB
Memory Type	Shared	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	System	System
Bus Width	System	System

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Iris Plus Graphics 655 draws 15W versus the Radeon HD 6900M's 75W — a 133.3% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics 655 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Plus Graphics 655) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6900M). Power connectors: Integrated vs 1x 6-pin.