
Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X

Radeon R9 M295X
Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X vs Radeon R9 M295X Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X vs Radeon R9 M295X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X vs Radeon R9 M295X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X
2013Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 200W instead of 250W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 M295X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2013 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌27400% longer card at 275mm vs 1mm.
Radeon R9 M295X
2014Why buy it
- ✅0.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 3 GB).
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 275mm, a 274mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌0.3% HIGHER MSRP$300 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
- ❌25% higher power demand at 250W vs 200W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X vs Radeon R9 M295X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X
The Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,248 points. Launch price was $299.

Radeon R9 M295X
The Radeon R9 M295X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 23 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,150 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X scores 5,248 and the Radeon R9 M295X reaches 5,150 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R9 M295X uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 M295X). Raw compute: 4.096 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X) vs 2.961 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M295X).
| Feature | Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,248+2% | 5,150 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.096 TFLOPS+38% | 2.961 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 128 | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+50% | 512 KB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X has 3 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M295X carries 4 GB. Radeon R9 M295X gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 264 GB/s (Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X) vs 176 GB/s (Radeon R9 M295X) — a 50% advantage for the Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X and 256-bit on the Radeon R9 M295X. L2 Cache: 768 KB (Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X) vs 512 KB (Radeon R9 M295X) — the Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB | 4 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 264 GB/s+50% | 176 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+50% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+50% | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_1) (Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X) vs 12 (Radeon R9 M295X). Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 |
| Max Displays | 6 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 M295X). Decoder: UVD 3.2 vs UVD 4.2.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 3.2 | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X draws 200W versus the Radeon R9 M295X's 250W — a 22.2% difference. The Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M295X). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 275mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W-20% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 275mm | 1mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80 C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 26.2+27% | 20.6 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X came in at $299, while the Radeon R9 M295X launched at $300. On MSRP, Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X was 0.3% cheaper ($1 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 17.6 (Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X) vs 17.2 (Radeon R9 M295X) — the Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X offers 2.3% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 M295X (2014 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299 | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.6+2% | 17.2 |
| Codename | Tahiti | Amethyst |
| Release | October 8 2013 | November 23 2014 |
| Ranking | #404 | #437 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















