Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X
VS
Radeon R9 M295X

Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X vs Radeon R9 M295X

AMD

Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X

2013Boost: 1000 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 M295X

2014Core: 723 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M295X

#263
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
632%
#265
573%
#266
572%
#270
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
520%
#271
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
516%
#273
Radeon R9 M295X
MSRP: $300|Avg: $150
100%
#274
GeForce GT 325M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $20
99%
#275
GeForce GTS 160M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
99%
#276
GeForce GTX 470M SLI
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $60
99%
#277
Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 3 3200G
MSRP: $99|Avg: $70
98%
#279
Radeon RX Vega 9
MSRP: $99|Avg: $50
98%
#282
Iris Xe Graphics G7
MSRP: $200|Avg: $100
96%
#283
Radeon R9 M395
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
96%
#285
GeForce GT 755M SLI
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
96%
#286
GeForce GTX 950A
MSRP: $159|Avg: $30
95%
#288
Radeon 540X
MSRP: $99|Avg: $40
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R9 M295X offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightRadeon HD 7970 / R9 280XRadeon R9 M295X
Performance
Leading raw performance (+1.9%)
Lower raw frame rates (-1.9%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+33.3%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
Standard Size (275mm)
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $150), it costs 73% less, resulting in a 282.1% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon HD 7970 / R9 280XRadeon R9 M295X
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+282.1%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($40)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X and Radeon R9 M295X

AMD

Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X

The Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,248 points. Launch price was $299.

AMD

Radeon R9 M295X

The Radeon R9 M295X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 23 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,150 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X scores 5,248 and the Radeon R9 M295X reaches 5,150 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R9 M295X uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 M295X). Raw compute: 4.096 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X) vs 2.961 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M295X).

FeatureRadeon HD 7970 / R9 280XRadeon R9 M295X
G3D Mark Score
5,248+2%
5,150
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GCN 3.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2048
2048
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.096 TFLOPS+38%
2.961 TFLOPS
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
128
128
L1 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB+50%
512 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 7970 / R9 280XRadeon R9 M295X
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M295X has 4 GB. The Radeon R9 M295X offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 264 GB/s (Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X) vs 176 GB/s (Radeon R9 M295X) — a 50% advantage for the Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X. Bus width: 384-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 768 KB (Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X) vs 512 KB (Radeon R9 M295X) — the Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon HD 7970 / R9 280XRadeon R9 M295X
VRAM Capacity
3 GB
4 GB+33%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
264 GB/s+50%
176 GB/s
Bus Width
384-bit+50%
256-bit
L2 Cache
768 KB+50%
512 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_1) (Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X) vs 12 (Radeon R9 M295X). Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 0.

FeatureRadeon HD 7970 / R9 280XRadeon R9 M295X
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12
Max Displays
6
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 M295X). Decoder: UVD 3.2 vs UVD 4.2.

FeatureRadeon HD 7970 / R9 280XRadeon R9 M295X
Encoder
VCE 1.0
VCE 3.0
Decoder
UVD 3.2
UVD 4.2
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X draws 200W versus the Radeon R9 M295X's 250W — a 22.2% difference. The Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M295X). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 275mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.

FeatureRadeon HD 7970 / R9 280XRadeon R9 M295X
TDP
200W-20%
250W
Recommended PSU
500W
350W-30%
Power Connector
6-pin + 8-pin
Mobile
Length
275mm
1mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
80 C
Perf/Watt
26.2+27%
20.6
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X launched at $299 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the Radeon R9 M295X launched at $300 and now averages $150. The Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X costs 73.3% less ($110 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 131.2 (Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X) vs 34.3 (Radeon R9 M295X) — the Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X offers 282.5% better value. The Radeon R9 M295X is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2013).

FeatureRadeon HD 7970 / R9 280XRadeon R9 M295X
MSRP
$299
$300
Avg Price (30d)
$40-73%
$150
Performance per Dollar
131.2+283%
34.3
Codename
Tahiti
Amethyst
Release
October 8 2013
November 23 2014
Ranking
#404
#437