GRID P4-8Q vs Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X

GRID P4-8Q

2015Core: 722 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X

2013Boost: 1000 MHz

GRID P4-8Q vs Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID P4-8Q vs Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID P4-8Q

2015

Why buy it

  • 33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 3 GB).
  • Draws 100W instead of 200W, a 100W reduction.
  • More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 568.9% HIGHER MSRP
    $2,000 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.6 vs 17.6 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).

Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X

2013

Why buy it

  • Costs $1,701 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
  • Delivers 564.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.6 vs 2.6 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2013 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 100% higher power demand at 200W vs 100W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GRID P4-8Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.7% in PassMark G3D (5,283 vs 5,248), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GRID P4-8Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 3 GB of VRAM and a newer 2015 generation instead of 2013. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,701 cheaper on MSRP at $299 vs $2,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 564.5% (17.6 vs 2.6), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GRID P4-8Q has the stronger long-term case.

GRID P4-8Q vs Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GRID P4-8Q

The GRID P4-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 722 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,283 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X

The Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,248 points. Launch price was $299.

Graphics Performance

The GRID P4-8Q scores 5,283 and the Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X reaches 5,248 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P4-8Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID P4-8Q) vs 2,048 (Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X). Raw compute: 2.218 TFLOPS (GRID P4-8Q) vs 4.096 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X).

FeatureGRID P4-8QRadeon HD 7970 / R9 280X
G3D Mark Score
5,283
5,248
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1536
2048+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.218 TFLOPS
4.096 TFLOPS+85%
ROPs
64+100%
32
TMUs
96
128+33%
L1 Cache
576 KB+13%
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB+167%
0.75 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGRID P4-8QRadeon HD 7970 / R9 280X
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID P4-8Q has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X carries 3 GB. GRID P4-8Q gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GRID P4-8Q and 384-bit on the Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID P4-8Q) vs 0.75 MB (Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X) — the GRID P4-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGRID P4-8QRadeon HD 7970 / R9 280X
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+33%
3 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit
384-bit+200%
L2 Cache
2 MB+167%
0.75 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID P4-8Q draws 100W versus the Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X's 200W — a 66.7% difference. The GRID P4-8Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P4-8Q) vs 500W (Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin + 8-pin.

FeatureGRID P4-8QRadeon HD 7970 / R9 280X
TDP
100W-50%
200W
Recommended PSU
350W-30%
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
6-pin + 8-pin
Length
275mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
80 C
Perf/Watt
52.8+102%
26.2
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID P4-8Q came in at $2000, while the Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X launched at $299. On MSRP, Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X was 85% cheaper ($1701 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.6 (GRID P4-8Q) vs 17.6 (Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X) — the Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X offers 576.9% better value. The newer card here is GRID P4-8Q (2015 vs 2013).

FeatureGRID P4-8QRadeon HD 7970 / R9 280X
MSRP
$2000
$299-85%
Performance per Dollar
2.6
17.6+577%
Codename
GM204
Tahiti
Release
August 30 2015
October 8 2013
Ranking
#535
#404

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.