GRID P4-8Q vs Quadro P2000 (móvel)

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID P4-8Q vs Quadro P2000 (móvel) FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID P4-8Q vs Quadro P2000 (móvel): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID P4-8Q

2015

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
300% HIGHER MSRP
$2,000 MSRPvs$500 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.6 vs 10.7 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
❌33.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 75W.

Quadro P2000 (móvel)

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,500 less on MSRP ($500 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 305.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.7 vs 2.6 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
✅GRID P4-8Q is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Quadro P2000 (móvel) is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 75W instead of 100W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro P2000 (móvel) is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.3% in PassMark G3D (5,353 vs 5,283), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro P2000 (móvel) is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 16nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2015. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro P2000 (móvel) makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,500 cheaper on MSRP at $500 vs $2,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 305.3% (10.7 vs 2.6), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GRID P4-8Q vs Quadro P2000 (móvel) Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID P4-8Q

The GRID P4-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 722 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,283 points.

Quadro P2000 (móvel)

The Quadro P2000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 15 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1291 MHz to 1291 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,353 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID P4-8Q scores 5,283 and the Quadro P2000 (móvel) reaches 5,353 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P4-8Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Quadro P2000 (móvel) uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID P4-8Q) vs 1,152 (Quadro P2000 (móvel)). Raw compute: 2.218 TFLOPS (GRID P4-8Q) vs 2.974 TFLOPS (Quadro P2000 (móvel)).

Feature	GRID P4-8Q	Quadro P2000 (móvel)
G3D Mark Score	5,283	5,353+1%
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	Pascal
Process Node	28 nm	16 nm
Shading Units	1536+33%	1152
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.218 TFLOPS	2.974 TFLOPS+34%
ROPs	64+100%	32
TMUs	96+33%	72
L1 Cache	576 KB+33%	432 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+60%	1.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID P4-8Q	Quadro P2000 (móvel)
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GRID P4-8Q and 128-bit on the Quadro P2000 (móvel). L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID P4-8Q) vs 1.25 MB (Quadro P2000 (móvel)) — the GRID P4-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID P4-8Q	Quadro P2000 (móvel)
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+60%	1.25 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID P4-8Q draws 100W versus the Quadro P2000 (móvel)'s 75W — a 28.6% difference. The Quadro P2000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P4-8Q) vs 350W (Quadro P2000 (móvel)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GRID P4-8Q	Quadro P2000 (móvel)
TDP	100W	75W-25%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt	52.8	71.4+35%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID P4-8Q came in at $2000, while the Quadro P2000 (móvel) launched at $500. On MSRP, Quadro P2000 (móvel) was 75% cheaper ($1500 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.6 (GRID P4-8Q) vs 10.7 (Quadro P2000 (móvel)) — the Quadro P2000 (móvel) offers 311.5% better value. The newer card here is Quadro P2000 (móvel) (2019 vs 2015).

Feature	GRID P4-8Q	Quadro P2000 (móvel)
MSRP	$2000	$500-75%
Performance per Dollar	2.6	10.7+312%
Codename	GM204	GP106
Release	August 30 2015	February 15 2019
Ranking	#535	#399

Search GRID P4-8Q on Amazon

Search Quadro P2000 (móvel) on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.