GRID P4-8Q
VS
Quadro P2000 (móvel)

GRID P4-8Q vs Quadro P2000 (móvel)

GRID P4-8Q

2015Core: 722 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro P2000 (móvel)

2019Core: 1291 MHzBoost: 1291 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GRID P4-8Q is positioned at rank 261 and the Quadro P2000 (móvel) is on rank 134, so the Quadro P2000 (móvel) offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GRID P4-8Q

#107
Quadro P6000
MSRP: $5999|Avg: $1500
98%
#108
Quadro M6000
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $500
89%
#246
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
5596%
#261
GRID P4-8Q
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $200
100%
#262
Quadro K2000
MSRP: $599|Avg: $500
100%
#264
FirePro 3D V5800
MSRP: $479|Avg: $30
97%
#265
GRID M3-3020
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $50
95%
#266
GRID P40-8Q
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150
95%
#267
GRID M40
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $100
95%
#268
FirePro V3800
MSRP: $129|Avg: $12
94%
#269
FirePro V5800
MSRP: $479|Avg: $15
94%
#270
FirePro 3D V7800
MSRP: $759|Avg: $40
93%
#271
FirePro S9050
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1825
93%
#272
FirePro R5000
MSRP: $1099|Avg: $150
91%
#273
GRID M6-8Q
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100
90%
#276
GRID K120Q
MSRP: $125|Avg: $20
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro P2000 (móvel)

#67
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1450
97%
#119
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
1379%
#134
Quadro P2000 (móvel)
MSRP: $500|Avg: $150
100%
#135
Quadro P3000
MSRP: $600|Avg: $80
99%
#136
Quadro P3000 (móvel)
MSRP: $600|Avg: $200
99%
#139
Quadro T1000 (móvel)
MSRP: $500|Avg: $120
93%
#140
Radeon Pro V520
MSRP: $800|Avg: $300
93%
#141
Quadro M5500
MSRP: $800|Avg: $200
92%
#142
Quadro K1200
MSRP: $300|Avg: $184
92%
#143
Quadro P400
MSRP: $169|Avg: $60
92%
#144
Radeon Pro WX 7100
MSRP: $799|Avg: $180
90%
#145
Quadro M520
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
89%
#146
Radeon Sky 500
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
88%
#147
Quadro M5000
MSRP: $999|Avg: $120
88%
#148
Radeon Pro WX 4100
MSRP: $399|Avg: $85
86%
#149
Quadro P4000 (móvel)
MSRP: $819|Avg: $290
86%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Quadro P2000 (móvel) uses modern memory architecture. The Quadro P2000 (móvel) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GRID P4-8Q lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro P2000 (móvel) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID P4-8Q.

InsightGRID P4-8QQuadro P2000 (móvel)
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1.3%)
Leading raw performance (+1.3%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019))
Pascal (2016−2021) (16nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The Quadro P2000 (móvel) offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $150 versus $200 for the GRID P4-8Q, it costs 25% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 35.1% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGRID P4-8QQuadro P2000 (móvel)
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+35.1%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($200)
More affordable ($150)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GRID P4-8Q and Quadro P2000 (móvel)

NVIDIA

GRID P4-8Q

The GRID P4-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 722 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,283 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro P2000 (móvel)

The Quadro P2000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 15 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1291 MHz to 1291 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,353 points.

Graphics Performance

The GRID P4-8Q scores 5,283 and the Quadro P2000 (móvel) reaches 5,353 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P4-8Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Quadro P2000 (móvel) uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID P4-8Q) vs 1,152 (Quadro P2000 (móvel)). Raw compute: 2.218 TFLOPS (GRID P4-8Q) vs 2.974 TFLOPS (Quadro P2000 (móvel)).

FeatureGRID P4-8QQuadro P2000 (móvel)
G3D Mark Score
5,283
5,353+1%
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
Pascal
Process Node
28 nm
16 nm
Shading Units
1536+33%
1152
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.218 TFLOPS
2.974 TFLOPS+34%
ROPs
64+100%
32
TMUs
96+33%
72
L1 Cache
576 KB+33%
432 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB+60%
1.25 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGRID P4-8QQuadro P2000 (móvel)
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID P4-8Q) vs 1.25 MB (Quadro P2000 (móvel)) — the GRID P4-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGRID P4-8QQuadro P2000 (móvel)
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+60%
1.25 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID P4-8Q draws 100W versus the Quadro P2000 (móvel)'s 75W — a 28.6% difference. The Quadro P2000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P4-8Q) vs 350W (Quadro P2000 (móvel)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGRID P4-8QQuadro P2000 (móvel)
TDP
100W
75W-25%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt
52.8
71.4+35%
💰

Value Analysis

The GRID P4-8Q launched at $2000 MSRP and currently averages $200, while the Quadro P2000 (móvel) launched at $500 and now averages $150. The Quadro P2000 (móvel) costs 25% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 26.4 (GRID P4-8Q) vs 35.7 (Quadro P2000 (móvel)) — the Quadro P2000 (móvel) offers 35.2% better value. The Quadro P2000 (móvel) is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2015).

FeatureGRID P4-8QQuadro P2000 (móvel)
MSRP
$2000
$500-75%
Avg Price (30d)
$200
$150-25%
Performance per Dollar
26.4
35.7+35%
Codename
GM204
GP106
Release
August 30 2015
February 15 2019
Ranking
#535
#399