GRID P4-8Q vs Tesla K80

GRID P4-8Q

2015Core: 722 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Tesla K80

2014Core: 562 MHzBoost: 824 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GRID P4-8Q vs Tesla K80 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID P4-8Q vs Tesla K80: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID P4-8Q

2015

Why buy it

  • Costs $3,000 less on MSRP ($2,000 MSRP vs $5,000 MSRP).
  • Delivers 146.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.6 vs 1.1 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $5,000 MSRP).
  • Draws 100W instead of 300W, a 200W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Tesla K80

2014

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • 2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 150% HIGHER MSRP
    $5,000 MSRPvs$2,000 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.1 vs 2.6 G3D/$ ($5,000 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
  • 200% higher power demand at 300W vs 100W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Tesla K80 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.5% in PassMark G3D (5,363 vs 5,283), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GRID P4-8Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2015 generation instead of 2014. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GRID P4-8Q makes the most sense to buy today. It is $3,000 cheaper on MSRP at $2,000 vs $5,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 146.3% (2.6 vs 1.1), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Tesla K80 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GRID P4-8Q vs Tesla K80 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GRID P4-8Q

The GRID P4-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 722 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,283 points.

NVIDIA

Tesla K80

The Tesla K80 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 17 2014. It features the Kepler 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 562 MHz to 824 MHz. It has 2496 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,363 points.

Graphics Performance

The GRID P4-8Q scores 5,283 and the Tesla K80 reaches 5,363 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P4-8Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Tesla K80 uses Kepler 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID P4-8Q) vs 2,496 (Tesla K80). Raw compute: 2.218 TFLOPS (GRID P4-8Q) vs 4.113 TFLOPS ×2 (Tesla K80).

FeatureGRID P4-8QTesla K80
G3D Mark Score
5,283
5,363+2%
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
Kepler 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1536
2496 ×2+63%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.218 TFLOPS
4.113 TFLOPS ×2+85%
ROPs
64+33%
48 ×2
TMUs
96
208 ×2+117%
L1 Cache
576 KB+177%
208 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB+33%
1.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGRID P4-8QTesla K80
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GRID P4-8Q and 128-bit on the Tesla K80. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID P4-8Q) vs 1.5 MB (Tesla K80) — the GRID P4-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGRID P4-8QTesla K80
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+33%
1.5 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID P4-8Q draws 100W versus the Tesla K80's 300W — a 100% difference. The GRID P4-8Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P4-8Q) vs 350W (Tesla K80). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGRID P4-8QTesla K80
TDP
100W-67%
300W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt
52.8+195%
17.9
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID P4-8Q came in at $2000, while the Tesla K80 launched at $5000. On MSRP, GRID P4-8Q was 60% cheaper ($3000 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.6 (GRID P4-8Q) vs 1.1 (Tesla K80) — the GRID P4-8Q offers 136.4% better value. The newer card here is GRID P4-8Q (2015 vs 2014).

FeatureGRID P4-8QTesla K80
MSRP
$2000-60%
$5000
Performance per Dollar
2.6+136%
1.1
Codename
GM204
GK210
Release
August 30 2015
November 17 2014
Ranking
#535
#419

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.