Arc A310
GRID P4-8Q
Arc A310 vs GRID P4-8Q Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Arc A310 vs GRID P4-8Q FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Arc A310 vs GRID P4-8Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Arc A310
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,900 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1958.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 54.4 vs 2.6 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 100W, a 25W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
GRID P4-8Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌1900% HIGHER MSRP$2,000 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.6 vs 54.4 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 75W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Arc A310 vs GRID P4-8Q Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Arc A310
The Arc A310 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,438 points.
GRID P4-8Q
The GRID P4-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 722 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,283 points.
Graphics Performance
The Arc A310 scores 5,438 and the GRID P4-8Q reaches 5,283 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A310 is built on Generation 12.7 while the GRID P4-8Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 6 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 768 (Arc A310) vs 1,536 (GRID P4-8Q). Raw compute: 3.072 TFLOPS (Arc A310) vs 2.218 TFLOPS (GRID P4-8Q).
| Feature | Arc A310 | GRID P4-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,438+3% | 5,283 |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 1536+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.072 TFLOPS+39% | 2.218 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 32 | 96+200% |
| L1 Cache | 1.1 MB+96% | 0.56 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc A310 | GRID P4-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Arc A310 and 128-bit on the GRID P4-8Q. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Arc A310) vs 2 MB (GRID P4-8Q) — the Arc A310 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc A310 | GRID P4-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A310 draws 75W versus the GRID P4-8Q's 100W — a 28.6% difference. The Arc A310 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Arc A310) vs 350W (GRID P4-8Q). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Arc A310 | GRID P4-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-25% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 169mm | — |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 72.5+37% | 52.8 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Arc A310 came in at $100, while the GRID P4-8Q launched at $2000. On MSRP, Arc A310 was 95% cheaper ($1900 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 54.4 (Arc A310) vs 2.6 (GRID P4-8Q) — the Arc A310 offers 1992.3% better value. The newer card here is Arc A310 (2022 vs 2015).
| Feature | Arc A310 | GRID P4-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-95% | $2000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 54.4+1992% | 2.6 |
| Codename | DG2-128 | GM204 |
| Release | October 12 2022 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #422 | #535 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc A310 and GRID P4-8Q
