GRID P4-8Q vs Radeon 760M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID P4-8Q vs Radeon 760M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID P4-8Q vs Radeon 760M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID P4-8Q

2015

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌566.7% higher power demand at 100W vs 15W.

Radeon 760M

2024

Why buy it

✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 15W instead of 100W, a 85W reduction.
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon 760M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3.1% in PassMark G3D (5,449 vs 5,283), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon 760M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 4nm process instead of 28nm, 8 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2015. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GRID P4-8Q makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GRID P4-8Q is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon 760M has the stronger long-term case.

GRID P4-8Q vs Radeon 760M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID P4-8Q

The GRID P4-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 722 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,283 points.

Radeon 760M

The Radeon 760M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2599 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,449 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID P4-8Q scores 5,283 and the Radeon 760M reaches 5,449 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P4-8Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon 760M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 28 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID P4-8Q) vs 512 (Radeon 760M). Raw compute: 2.218 TFLOPS (GRID P4-8Q) vs 5.323 TFLOPS (Radeon 760M).

Feature	GRID P4-8Q	Radeon 760M
G3D Mark Score	5,283	5,449+3%
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	28 nm	4 nm
Shading Units	1536+200%	512
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.218 TFLOPS	5.323 TFLOPS+140%
ROPs	64+300%	16
TMUs	96+200%	32
L1 Cache	576 KB+350%	128 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID P4-8Q	Radeon 760M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GRID P4-8Q and System on the Radeon 760M.

Feature	GRID P4-8Q	Radeon 760M
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	Shared
Bus Width	128-bit	System
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID P4-8Q draws 100W versus the Radeon 760M's 15W — a 147.8% difference. The Radeon 760M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P4-8Q) vs 350W (Radeon 760M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

Feature	GRID P4-8Q	Radeon 760M
TDP	100W	15W-85%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Slots	—	0
Temp (Load)	—	80°C
Perf/Watt	52.8	363.3+588%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon 760M (2024 vs 2015).

Feature	GRID P4-8Q	Radeon 760M
MSRP	$2000	—
Codename	GM204	Phoenix
Release	August 30 2015	January 31 2024
Ranking	#535	#421

Search GRID P4-8Q on Amazon

Search Radeon 760M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.