GRID P4-8Q vs Radeon RX 6300
GRID P4-8Q
Popular choices:
Radeon RX 6300
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GRID P4-8Q is positioned at rank 261 and the Radeon RX 6300 is on rank 14, so the Radeon RX 6300 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID P4-8Q
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6300
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX 6300 is significantly newer (2022 vs 2015). The Radeon RX 6300 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GRID P4-8Q lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 6300 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID P4-8Q.
| Insight | GRID P4-8Q | Radeon RX 6300 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (6nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 6300 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $40 versus $200 for the GRID P4-8Q, it costs 80% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 403.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID P4-8Q | Radeon RX 6300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+403.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($200) | ✅More affordable ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID P4-8Q and Radeon RX 6300
GRID P4-8Q
The GRID P4-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 722 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,283 points.
Radeon RX 6300
The Radeon RX 6300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,319 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID P4-8Q scores 5,283 and the Radeon RX 6300 reaches 5,319 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P4-8Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon RX 6300 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID P4-8Q) vs 768 (Radeon RX 6300). Raw compute: 2.218 TFLOPS (GRID P4-8Q) vs 3.686 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6300).
| Feature | GRID P4-8Q | Radeon RX 6300 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,283 | 5,319 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+100% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.218 TFLOPS | 3.686 TFLOPS+66% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 96+100% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 576 KB+125% | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6300 is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GRID P4-8Q lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | GRID P4-8Q | Radeon RX 6300 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 3 (Native) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 32-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID P4-8Q) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 6300) — the GRID P4-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID P4-8Q | Radeon RX 6300 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+300% | 32-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID P4-8Q draws 100W versus the Radeon RX 6300's 35W — a 96.3% difference. The Radeon RX 6300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P4-8Q) vs 300W (Radeon RX 6300). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GRID P4-8Q | Radeon RX 6300 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 35W-65% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 160mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Perf/Watt | 52.8 | 152.0+188% |
Value Analysis
The GRID P4-8Q launched at $2000 MSRP and currently averages $200, while the Radeon RX 6300 launched at $60 and now averages $40. The Radeon RX 6300 costs 80% less ($160 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 26.4 (GRID P4-8Q) vs 133.0 (Radeon RX 6300) — the Radeon RX 6300 offers 403.8% better value. The Radeon RX 6300 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2015).
| Feature | GRID P4-8Q | Radeon RX 6300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2000 | $60-97% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $200 | $40-80% |
| Performance per Dollar | 26.4 | 133.0+404% |
| Codename | GM204 | Navi 24 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #535 | #379 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GRID P4-8Q and Radeon RX 6300
