GRID P4-8Q vs Radeon RX 6300

GRID P4-8Q

2015Core: 722 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon RX 6300

2022Core: 2000 MHzBoost: 2400 MHz
RX family
·······

GRID P4-8Q vs Radeon RX 6300 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID P4-8Q vs Radeon RX 6300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID P4-8Q

2015

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
  • 2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 3233.3% HIGHER MSRP
    $2,000 MSRPvs$60 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.6 vs 88.7 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
  • 185.7% higher power demand at 100W vs 35W.

Radeon RX 6300

2022

Why buy it

  • Costs $1,940 less on MSRP ($60 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
  • Delivers 3256% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 88.7 vs 2.6 G3D/$ ($60 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 35W instead of 100W, a 65W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon RX 6300 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.7% in PassMark G3D (5,319 vs 5,283), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon RX 6300 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer feature stack, with FSR 3 (2023) and FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023), while GRID P4-8Q is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 6nm process instead of 28nm, 12 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2015. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon RX 6300 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,940 cheaper on MSRP at $60 vs $2,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 3256% (88.7 vs 2.6), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GRID P4-8Q vs Radeon RX 6300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GRID P4-8Q

The GRID P4-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 722 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,283 points.

AMD

Radeon RX 6300

The Radeon RX 6300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,319 points.

Graphics Performance

The GRID P4-8Q scores 5,283 and the Radeon RX 6300 reaches 5,319 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P4-8Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon RX 6300 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID P4-8Q) vs 768 (Radeon RX 6300). Raw compute: 2.218 TFLOPS (GRID P4-8Q) vs 3.686 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6300).

FeatureGRID P4-8QRadeon RX 6300
G3D Mark Score
5,283
5,319
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
RDNA 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
6 nm
Shading Units
1536+100%
768
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.218 TFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS+66%
ROPs
64+100%
32
TMUs
96+100%
48
L1 Cache
576 KB+125%
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 6300 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GRID P4-8Q does not have comparable native support in the same tier.

FeatureGRID P4-8QRadeon RX 6300
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR 3
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GRID P4-8Q and 32-bit on the Radeon RX 6300. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID P4-8Q) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 6300) — the GRID P4-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGRID P4-8QRadeon RX 6300
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit+300%
32-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID P4-8Q draws 100W versus the Radeon RX 6300's 35W — a 96.3% difference. The Radeon RX 6300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P4-8Q) vs 300W (Radeon RX 6300). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGRID P4-8QRadeon RX 6300
TDP
100W
35W-65%
Recommended PSU
350W
300W-14%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
160mm
Slots
1
Perf/Watt
52.8
152.0+188%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID P4-8Q came in at $2000, while the Radeon RX 6300 launched at $60. On MSRP, Radeon RX 6300 was 97% cheaper ($1940 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.6 (GRID P4-8Q) vs 88.7 (Radeon RX 6300) — the Radeon RX 6300 offers 3311.5% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 6300 (2022 vs 2015).

FeatureGRID P4-8QRadeon RX 6300
MSRP
$2000
$60-97%
Performance per Dollar
2.6
88.7+3312%
Codename
GM204
Navi 24
Release
August 30 2015
January 4 2022
Ranking
#535
#379

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.