
GeForce GTX 670

Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X
GeForce GTX 670 vs Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 670 vs Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 670 vs Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 670
2012Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 3 GB).
- ✅Draws 170W instead of 200W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 275mm, a 34mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌33.4% HIGHER MSRP$399 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 13.4 vs 17.6 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X
2013Why buy it
- ✅20.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 30.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.6 vs 13.4 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2013 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌17.6% higher power demand at 200W vs 170W.
- ❌14.1% longer card at 275mm vs 241mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 670 vs Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 670
The GeForce GTX 670 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 10 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 980 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,361 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X
The Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,248 points. Launch price was $299.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 670 scores 5,361 and the Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X reaches 5,248 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 670 is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,344 (GeForce GTX 670) vs 2,048 (Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X). Raw compute: 2.634 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 670) vs 4.096 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X). Boost clocks: 980 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 670 | Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,361+2% | 5,248 |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1344 | 2048+52% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.634 TFLOPS | 4.096 TFLOPS+56% |
| Boost Clock | 980 MHz | 1000 MHz+2% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 112 | 128+14% |
| L1 Cache | 112 KB | 512 KB+357% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 670 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 670 | Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 670 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X carries 3 GB. GeForce GTX 670 gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 670) vs 264 GB/s (Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X) — a 37.5% advantage for the Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 670 and 384-bit on the Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce GTX 670) vs 768 KB (Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X) — the Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 670 | Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+33% | 3 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 264 GB/s+38% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 670) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 670 | Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (3rd Gen) (GeForce GTX 670) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X). Decoder: NVDEC (1st Gen) vs UVD 3.2. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 670) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 (Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 670 | Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (3rd Gen) | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (1st Gen) | UVD 3.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 670 draws 170W versus the Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X's 200W — a 16.2% difference. The GeForce GTX 670 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 670) vs 500W (Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 241mm vs 275mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 82 C vs 80 C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 670 | Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 170W-15% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 241mm | 275mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 82 C | 80 C-2% |
| Perf/Watt | 31.5+20% | 26.2 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 670 came in at $399, while the Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X launched at $299. On MSRP, Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X was 25.1% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 13.4 (GeForce GTX 670) vs 17.6 (Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X) — the Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X offers 31.3% better value. The newer card here is Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X (2013 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 670 | Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $299-25% |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.4 | 17.6+31% |
| Codename | GK104 | Tahiti |
| Release | May 10 2012 | October 8 2013 |
| Ranking | #424 | #404 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















