Radeon HD 8240 vs Radeon HD4650

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon HD 8240 vs Radeon HD4650 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon HD 8240 vs Radeon HD4650: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon HD 8240

2012

Why buy it

✅20.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon HD4650

2010

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 8240 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 8240 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 20.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.5% in PassMark G3D (246 vs 240), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon HD 8240 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2012 generation instead of 2010. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 8240 makes the most sense to buy today. It is priced the same on MSRP at $50 vs $50, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 2.5% (4.9 vs 4.8), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Radeon HD 8240 vs Radeon HD4650 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon HD 8240

The Radeon HD 8240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 5 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 246 points. Launch price was $349.

Radeon HD4650

The Radeon HD4650 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 240 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 8240 scores 246 and the Radeon HD4650 reaches 240 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 8240 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon HD4650 uses TeraScale 3, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon HD 8240) vs 1,408 (Radeon HD4650). Raw compute: 2.56 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8240) vs 2.253 TFLOPS (Radeon HD4650).

Feature	Radeon HD 8240	Radeon HD4650
G3D Mark Score	246+3%	240
Architecture	GCN 1.0	TeraScale 3
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	1280	1408+10%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.56 TFLOPS+14%	2.253 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	80	88+10%
L1 Cache	320 KB	352 KB+10%
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon HD 8240	Radeon HD4650
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon HD 8240 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD4650.

Feature	Radeon HD 8240	Radeon HD4650
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 8240 draws 200W versus the Radeon HD4650's 200W — a 0% difference. The Radeon HD4650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 8240) vs 350W (Radeon HD4650). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Radeon HD 8240	Radeon HD4650
TDP	200W	200W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	—	193mm
Slots	—	1
Perf/Watt	1.2	1.2

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon HD 8240 came in at $50, while the Radeon HD4650 launched at $50. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.9 (Radeon HD 8240) vs 4.8 (Radeon HD4650) — the Radeon HD 8240 offers 2.1% better value. The newer card here is Radeon HD 8240 (2012 vs 2010).

Feature	Radeon HD 8240	Radeon HD4650
MSRP	$50	$50
Performance per Dollar	4.9+2%	4.8
Codename	Pitcairn	Cayman
Release	March 5 2012	December 14 2010
Ranking	#460	#623

Search Radeon HD 8240 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD4650 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.