CPU
GPU
Radeon HDG 4670
Popular choices:
FirePro 3D V3700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HDG 4670 is positioned at rank 297 and the FirePro 3D V3700 is on rank 303, so the Radeon HDG 4670 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HDG 4670
Performance Per Dollar FirePro 3D V3700
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro 3D V3700 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon HDG 4670 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon HDG 4670 | FirePro 3D V3700 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-5.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+5.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro 3D V3700 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro 3D V3700 holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $15), it costs 33% less, resulting in a 57.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HDG 4670 | FirePro 3D V3700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+57.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($15) | ✅More affordable ($10) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HDG 4670 and FirePro 3D V3700
Radeon HDG 4670
The Radeon HDG 4670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 880 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 170 points. Launch price was $369.
FirePro 3D V3700
The FirePro 3D V3700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 179 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon HDG 4670 scores 170 versus the FirePro 3D V3700's 179 — the FirePro 3D V3700 leads by 5.3%. The Radeon HDG 4670 is built on TeraScale 3 while the FirePro 3D V3700 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (Radeon HDG 4670) vs 2,048 (FirePro 3D V3700). Raw compute: 2.703 TFLOPS (Radeon HDG 4670) vs 3.482 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V3700).
| Feature | Radeon HDG 4670 | FirePro 3D V3700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 170 | 179+5% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 2048+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.703 TFLOPS | 3.482 TFLOPS+29% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 96 | 128+33% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 512 KB+167% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HDG 4670 | FirePro 3D V3700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HDG 4670 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the FirePro 3D V3700 has 256 MB. The Radeon HDG 4670 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon HDG 4670) vs 768 KB (FirePro 3D V3700) — the FirePro 3D V3700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HDG 4670 | FirePro 3D V3700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (Radeon HDG 4670) vs 10.1 (FirePro 3D V3700). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon HDG 4670 | FirePro 3D V3700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD 2 (Radeon HDG 4670) vs UVD (FirePro 3D V3700). Decoder: UVD 2 vs UVD.
| Feature | Radeon HDG 4670 | FirePro 3D V3700 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD 2 | UVD |
| Decoder | UVD 2 | UVD |
| Codecs | — | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HDG 4670 draws 250W versus the FirePro 3D V3700's 274W — a 9.2% difference. The Radeon HDG 4670 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HDG 4670) vs 350W (FirePro 3D V3700). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 193mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | Radeon HDG 4670 | FirePro 3D V3700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W-9% | 274W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 193mm | 168mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 65°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.7 | 0.7 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HDG 4670 launched at $67 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the FirePro 3D V3700 launched at $99 and now averages $10. The FirePro 3D V3700 costs 33.3% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 11.3 (Radeon HDG 4670) vs 17.9 (FirePro 3D V3700) — the FirePro 3D V3700 offers 58.4% better value. The FirePro 3D V3700 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2010).
| Feature | Radeon HDG 4670 | FirePro 3D V3700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $67-32% | $99 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | $10-33% |
| Performance per Dollar | 11.3 | 17.9+58% |
| Codename | Cayman | Tahiti |
| Release | December 14 2010 | January 18 2014 |
| Ranking | #596 | #423 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HDG 4670 and FirePro 3D V3700
