CPU
GPU
Radeon HDG 4670
Popular choices:
Mobility Radeon HD 2600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HDG 4670 is positioned at rank 297 and the Mobility Radeon HD 2600 is on rank 663, so the Radeon HDG 4670 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HDG 4670
Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon HD 2600
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HDG 4670 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (512 MB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Mobility Radeon HD 2600.
| Insight | Radeon HDG 4670 | Mobility Radeon HD 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HDG 4670 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HDG 4670 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $30), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 102.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HDG 4670 | Mobility Radeon HD 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+102.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($15) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HDG 4670 and Mobility Radeon HD 2600
Radeon HDG 4670
The Radeon HDG 4670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 880 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 170 points. Launch price was $369.
Mobility Radeon HD 2600
The Mobility Radeon HD 2600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 168 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HDG 4670 scores 170 and the Mobility Radeon HD 2600 reaches 168 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HDG 4670 is built on TeraScale 3 while the Mobility Radeon HD 2600 uses TeraScale 2, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (Radeon HDG 4670) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 2600). Raw compute: 2.703 TFLOPS (Radeon HDG 4670) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 2600).
| Feature | Radeon HDG 4670 | Mobility Radeon HD 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 170+1% | 168 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+92% | 800 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.703 TFLOPS+141% | 1.12 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 96+140% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB+140% | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HDG 4670 | Mobility Radeon HD 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HDG 4670 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Mobility Radeon HD 2600 has 256 MB. The Radeon HDG 4670 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon HDG 4670) vs 256 KB (Mobility Radeon HD 2600) — the Radeon HDG 4670 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HDG 4670 | Mobility Radeon HD 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (Radeon HDG 4670) vs 10.0 (Mobility Radeon HD 2600). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon HDG 4670 | Mobility Radeon HD 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD 2 (Radeon HDG 4670) vs Avivo HD (Mobility Radeon HD 2600). Decoder: UVD 2 vs Avivo HD.
| Feature | Radeon HDG 4670 | Mobility Radeon HD 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD 2 | Avivo HD |
| Decoder | UVD 2 | Avivo HD |
| Codecs | — | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HDG 4670 draws 250W versus the Mobility Radeon HD 2600's 50W — a 133.3% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 2600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HDG 4670) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 2600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon HDG 4670 | Mobility Radeon HD 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 50W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 193mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.7 | 3.4+386% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HDG 4670 launched at $67 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the Mobility Radeon HD 2600 launched at $100 and now averages $30. The Radeon HDG 4670 costs 50% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 11.3 (Radeon HDG 4670) vs 5.6 (Mobility Radeon HD 2600) — the Radeon HDG 4670 offers 101.8% better value.
| Feature | Radeon HDG 4670 | Mobility Radeon HD 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $67-33% | $100 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-50% | $30 |
| Performance per Dollar | 11.3+102% | 5.6 |
| Codename | Cayman | Broadway |
| Release | December 14 2010 | January 7 2010 |
| Ranking | #596 | #846 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HDG 4670 and Mobility Radeon HD 2600
