CPU
GPU
Radeon HDG 4670
Popular choices:
Quadro FX 380
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HDG 4670 is positioned at rank 297 and the Quadro FX 380 is on rank 327, so the Radeon HDG 4670 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HDG 4670
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 380
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro FX 380 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon HDG 4670 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon HDG 4670 | Quadro FX 380 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro FX 380 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro FX 380 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $15), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 4.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HDG 4670 | Quadro FX 380 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+4.1%) |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HDG 4670 and Quadro FX 380
Radeon HDG 4670
The Radeon HDG 4670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 880 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 170 points. Launch price was $369.
Quadro FX 380
The Quadro FX 380 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 177 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HDG 4670 scores 170 and the Quadro FX 380 reaches 177 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HDG 4670 is built on TeraScale 3 while the Quadro FX 380 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (Radeon HDG 4670) vs 240 (Quadro FX 380). Raw compute: 2.703 TFLOPS (Radeon HDG 4670) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 380).
| Feature | Radeon HDG 4670 | Quadro FX 380 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 170 | 177+4% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+540% | 240 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.703 TFLOPS+334% | 0.6221 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 96+20% | 80 |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HDG 4670 | Quadro FX 380 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HDG 4670 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 380 has 256 MB. The Radeon HDG 4670 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon HDG 4670) vs 256 KB (Quadro FX 380) — the Radeon HDG 4670 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HDG 4670 | Quadro FX 380 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (Radeon HDG 4670) vs 10_0 (Quadro FX 380). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon HDG 4670 | Quadro FX 380 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 10_0 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HDG 4670 draws 250W versus the Quadro FX 380's 189W — a 27.8% difference. The Quadro FX 380 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HDG 4670) vs 350W (Quadro FX 380). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 193mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | Radeon HDG 4670 | Quadro FX 380 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 189W-24% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 193mm | 168mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.7 | 0.9+29% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HDG 4670 launched at $67 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the Quadro FX 380 launched at $129 and now averages $15. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 11.3 (Radeon HDG 4670) vs 11.8 (Quadro FX 380) — the Quadro FX 380 offers 4.4% better value. The Radeon HDG 4670 is the newer GPU (2010 vs 2008).
| Feature | Radeon HDG 4670 | Quadro FX 380 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $67-48% | $129 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | $15 |
| Performance per Dollar | 11.3 | 11.8+4% |
| Codename | Cayman | GT200B |
| Release | December 14 2010 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #596 | #815 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HDG 4670 and Quadro FX 380
