CPU
GPU
Radeon HDG 4670
Popular choices:
GeForce G100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HDG 4670 is positioned at rank 297 and the GeForce G100 is on rank 247, so the GeForce G100 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HDG 4670
Performance Per Dollar GeForce G100
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce G100 is significantly newer (2017 vs 2010). The GeForce G100 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HDG 4670 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce G100 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HDG 4670.
| Insight | Radeon HDG 4670 | GeForce G100 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce G100 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce G100 holds the technical lead. Priced at $5 (vs $15), it costs 67% less, resulting in a 210.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HDG 4670 | GeForce G100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+210.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($15) | ✅More affordable ($5) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HDG 4670 and GeForce G100
Radeon HDG 4670
The Radeon HDG 4670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 880 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 170 points. Launch price was $369.
GeForce G100
The GeForce G100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 176 points. Launch price was $79.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HDG 4670 scores 170 and the GeForce G100 reaches 176 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HDG 4670 is built on TeraScale 3 while the GeForce G100 uses Pascal, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (Radeon HDG 4670) vs 384 (GeForce G100). Raw compute: 2.703 TFLOPS (Radeon HDG 4670) vs 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce G100). Boost clocks: 880 MHz vs 1468 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon HDG 4670 | GeForce G100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 170 | 176+4% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+300% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.703 TFLOPS+140% | 1.127 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 880 MHz | 1468 MHz+67% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 96+300% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB+33% | 144 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HDG 4670 | GeForce G100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon HDG 4670 | GeForce G100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (Radeon HDG 4670) vs 10.0 (GeForce G100). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon HDG 4670 | GeForce G100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD 2 (Radeon HDG 4670) vs No (GeForce G100). Decoder: UVD 2 vs PureVideo HD VP3.
| Feature | Radeon HDG 4670 | GeForce G100 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD 2 | No |
| Decoder | UVD 2 | PureVideo HD VP3 |
| Codecs | — | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HDG 4670 draws 250W versus the GeForce G100's 30W — a 157.1% difference. The GeForce G100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HDG 4670) vs 350W (GeForce G100). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 193mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | Radeon HDG 4670 | GeForce G100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 30W-88% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 193mm | 168mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 65°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.7 | 5.9+743% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HDG 4670 launched at $67 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the GeForce G100 launched at $40 and now averages $5. The GeForce G100 costs 66.7% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 11.3 (Radeon HDG 4670) vs 35.2 (GeForce G100) — the GeForce G100 offers 211.5% better value. The GeForce G100 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2010).
| Feature | Radeon HDG 4670 | GeForce G100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $67 | $40-40% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | $5-67% |
| Performance per Dollar | 11.3 | 35.2+212% |
| Codename | Cayman | GP108 |
| Release | December 14 2010 | May 17 2017 |
| Ranking | #596 | #641 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HDG 4670 and GeForce G100
