CPU
GPU
Radeon HDG 4670
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 3450
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HDG 4670 is positioned at rank 297 and the Radeon HD 3450 is on rank 273, so the Radeon HD 3450 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HDG 4670
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 3450
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 3450 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HDG 4670.
| Insight | Radeon HDG 4670 | Radeon HD 3450 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-5.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+5.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 3450 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 3450 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $15), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 5.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HDG 4670 | Radeon HD 3450 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+5.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HDG 4670 and Radeon HD 3450
Radeon HDG 4670
The Radeon HDG 4670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 880 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 170 points. Launch price was $369.
Radeon HD 3450
The Radeon HD 3450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 25 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 179 points. Launch price was $199.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon HDG 4670 scores 170 versus the Radeon HD 3450's 179 — the Radeon HD 3450 leads by 5.3%. The Radeon HDG 4670 is built on TeraScale 3 while the Radeon HD 3450 uses TeraScale, both on 40 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (Radeon HDG 4670) vs 800 (Radeon HD 3450). Raw compute: 2.703 TFLOPS (Radeon HDG 4670) vs 1 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 3450).
| Feature | Radeon HDG 4670 | Radeon HD 3450 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 170 | 179+5% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | TeraScale |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+92% | 800 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.703 TFLOPS+170% | 1 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 96+140% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB+20% | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HDG 4670 | Radeon HD 3450 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon HDG 4670) vs 256 KB (Radeon HD 3450) — the Radeon HDG 4670 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HDG 4670 | Radeon HD 3450 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HDG 4670 draws 250W versus the Radeon HD 3450's 110W — a 77.8% difference. The Radeon HD 3450 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HDG 4670) vs 350W (Radeon HD 3450). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Radeon HDG 4670 | Radeon HD 3450 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 110W-56% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 193mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.7 | 1.6+129% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HDG 4670 launched at $67 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the Radeon HD 3450 launched at $50 and now averages $15. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 11.3 (Radeon HDG 4670) vs 11.9 (Radeon HD 3450) — the Radeon HD 3450 offers 5.3% better value. The Radeon HDG 4670 is the newer GPU (2010 vs 2008).
| Feature | Radeon HDG 4670 | Radeon HD 3450 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $67 | $50-25% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | $15 |
| Performance per Dollar | 11.3 | 11.9+5% |
| Codename | Cayman | RV770 |
| Release | December 14 2010 | June 25 2008 |
| Ranking | #596 | #876 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HDG 4670 and Radeon HD 3450
