Radeon IGP 340M vs GeForce GTX 1650

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon IGP 340M is positioned at rank #414 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon IGP 340M

#398

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

147730%

#413

GRID RTX6000-2Q

MSRP: $6300|Avg: $1500

100%

#414

Radeon IGP 340M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#416

GRID M60-0B

MSRP: $19900|Avg: $19900

90%

#417

Quadro FX 4500 X2

MSRP: $2799|Avg: $2799

80%

#418

Quadro FX 5500

MSRP: $2999|Avg: $30

80%

#419

Quadro FX 1000

MSRP: $500|Avg: $30

70%

#420

Quadro FX 3400/4400

MSRP: $1799|Avg: $50

60%

#421

Quadro FX 1300

MSRP: $599|Avg: $15

60%

#422

Quadro FX 4000

MSRP: $2199|Avg: $50

50%

#423

RADEON IGP 320

MSRP: $100|Avg: $20

40%

#424

Quadro FX 500/FX 600

MSRP: $449|Avg: $15

20%

#425

Quadro FX 2000

MSRP: $3000|Avg: $40

10%

#426

GRID V100-8Q

MSRP: $10000|Avg: $10000

0%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 262200% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon IGP 340M.

Insight	Radeon IGP 340M	GeForce GTX 1650
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-262200%)	✅Leading raw performance (+262200%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020))	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+700%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 1650 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon IGP 340M Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon IGP 340M and GeForce GTX 1650

Radeon IGP 340M

The Radeon IGP 340M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 26 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 852 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon IGP 340M scores 3 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 262200%. The Radeon IGP 340M is built on GCN 5.0 while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 14 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Radeon IGP 340M) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 10.75 TFLOPS (Radeon IGP 340M) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 1500 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

Feature	Radeon IGP 340M	GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score	3	7,869+262200%
Architecture	GCN 5.0	Turing
Process Node	14 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	3584+300%	896
Compute (TFLOPS)	10.75 TFLOPS+260%	2.984 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1500 MHz	1665 MHz+11%
ROPs	64+100%	32
TMUs	224+300%	56
L1 Cache	896 KB	896 KB
L2 Cache	4 MB+300%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon IGP 340M	GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon IGP 340M comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon IGP 340M) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the Radeon IGP 340M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon IGP 340M	GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	4 GB+700%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	4 MB+300%	1 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon IGP 340M draws 230W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 101.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon IGP 340M) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.