Radeon IGP 340M vs MOBILITY/RADEON 9000
Radeon IGP 340M
Popular choices:
MOBILITY/RADEON 9000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon IGP 340M is positioned at rank #414 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon IGP 340M
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon IGP 340M is significantly newer (2018 vs 2010). The Radeon IGP 340M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 33.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon IGP 340M.
| Insight | Radeon IGP 340M | MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-33.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+33.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon IGP 340M and MOBILITY/RADEON 9000
Radeon IGP 340M
The Radeon IGP 340M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 26 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 852 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.
MOBILITY/RADEON 9000
The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon IGP 340M scores 3 versus the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000's 4 — the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 leads by 33.3%. The Radeon IGP 340M is built on GCN 5.0 while the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 uses TeraScale 2, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Radeon IGP 340M) vs 800 (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000). Raw compute: 10.75 TFLOPS (Radeon IGP 340M) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000).
| Feature | Radeon IGP 340M | MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3 | 4+33% |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+348% | 800 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.75 TFLOPS+860% | 1.12 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64+300% | 16 |
| TMUs | 224+460% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 896 KB+1020% | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+1500% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon IGP 340M | MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon IGP 340M) vs 0.25 MB (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) — the Radeon IGP 340M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon IGP 340M | MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+1500% | 0.25 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon IGP 340M draws 230W versus the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000's 10W — a 183.3% difference. The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon IGP 340M) vs 0W (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | Radeon IGP 340M | MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 230W | 10W-96% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 0W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.0 | 0.4 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon IGP 340M is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2010).
| Feature | Radeon IGP 340M | MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $0 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $49 |
| Codename | Vega 10 | Broadway |
| Release | August 26 2018 | January 7 2010 |
| Ranking | #593 | #846 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon IGP 340M and MOBILITY/RADEON 9000
