Radeon IGP 340M vs GeForce 6200A
Radeon IGP 340M
Popular choices:
GeForce 6200A
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon IGP 340M is positioned at rank #414 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon IGP 340M
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon IGP 340M uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon IGP 340M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 6200A lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 6200A is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 33.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon IGP 340M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon IGP 340M | GeForce 6200A |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-33.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+33.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce 6200A remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon IGP 340M and GeForce 6200A
Radeon IGP 340M
The Radeon IGP 340M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 26 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 852 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.
GeForce 6200A
The GeForce 6200A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon IGP 340M scores 3 versus the GeForce 6200A's 4 — the GeForce 6200A leads by 33.3%. The Radeon IGP 340M is built on GCN 5.0 while the GeForce 6200A uses Maxwell, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Radeon IGP 340M) vs 384 (GeForce 6200A). Raw compute: 10.75 TFLOPS (Radeon IGP 340M) vs 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce 6200A). Boost clocks: 1500 MHz vs 941 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon IGP 340M | GeForce 6200A |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3 | 4+33% |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+833% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.75 TFLOPS+1387% | 0.7227 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1500 MHz+59% | 941 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+700% | 8 |
| TMUs | 224+833% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 896 KB+367% | 192 KB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon IGP 340M | GeForce 6200A |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon IGP 340M comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 6200A has 128 MB. The Radeon IGP 340M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon IGP 340M) vs 1 MB (GeForce 6200A) — the Radeon IGP 340M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon IGP 340M | GeForce 6200A |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+300% | 0.125 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon IGP 340M draws 230W versus the GeForce 6200A's 33W — a 149.8% difference. The GeForce 6200A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon IGP 340M) vs 350W (GeForce 6200A). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.
| Feature | Radeon IGP 340M | GeForce 6200A |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 230W | 33W-86% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | — | 168mm |
| Height | — | 100mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 65°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.0 | 0.1 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon IGP 340M is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon IGP 340M | GeForce 6200A |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $0 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $0 |
| Codename | Vega 10 | GM108 |
| Release | August 26 2018 | March 13 2015 |
| Ranking | #593 | #810 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon IGP 340M and GeForce 6200A
