Radeon Pro 450 vs GeForce GTX 465
Radeon Pro 450
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 465
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Pro 450 is significantly newer (2016 vs 2010). The Radeon Pro 450 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 465 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro 450 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (2 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 465.
| Insight | Radeon Pro 450 | GeForce GTX 465 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon Pro 450 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon Pro 450 holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $40), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 2.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro 450 | GeForce GTX 465 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+2.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 450 and GeForce GTX 465
Radeon Pro 450
The Radeon Pro 450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,723 points.
GeForce GTX 465
The GeForce GTX 465 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 31 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,654 points. Launch price was $279.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 450 scores 2,723 and the GeForce GTX 465 reaches 2,654 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 450 is built on GCN 4.0 while the GeForce GTX 465 uses Fermi, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 640 (Radeon Pro 450) vs 352 (GeForce GTX 465). Raw compute: 1.024 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 450) vs 0.8554 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 465).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 450 | GeForce GTX 465 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,723+3% | 2,654 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Fermi |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 640+82% | 352 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.024 TFLOPS+20% | 0.8554 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 40 | 44+10% |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB | 704 KB+340% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro 450 | GeForce GTX 465 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro 450 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 465 has 1 GB. The Radeon Pro 450 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon Pro 450) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 465) — the Radeon Pro 450 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 450 | GeForce GTX 465 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+100% | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_0 (Radeon Pro 450) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 465). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 450 | GeForce GTX 465 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_0 | 12 (11_0) |
| Max Displays | 0 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro 450) vs None (GeForce GTX 465). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs VP4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 450 | GeForce GTX 465 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 | None |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | VP4 |
| Codecs | — | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 450 draws 35W versus the GeForce GTX 465's 200W — a 140.4% difference. The Radeon Pro 450 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 450) vs 550W (GeForce GTX 465). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 1mm vs 241mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 450 | GeForce GTX 465 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35W-83% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-36% | 550W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 1mm | 241mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 77.8+485% | 13.3 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro 450 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the GeForce GTX 465 launched at $279 and now averages $40. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 68.1 (Radeon Pro 450) vs 66.3 (GeForce GTX 465) — the Radeon Pro 450 offers 2.7% better value. The Radeon Pro 450 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2010).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 450 | GeForce GTX 465 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $279 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40 | $40 |
| Performance per Dollar | 68.1+3% | 66.3 |
| Codename | Baffin | GF100 |
| Release | October 30 2016 | May 31 2010 |
| Ranking | #612 | #618 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Pro 450 and GeForce GTX 465
