Radeon Pro 450
VS
GeForce GTX 560

Radeon Pro 450 vs GeForce GTX 560

AMD

Radeon Pro 450

2016Core: 800 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 560

2011Core: 810 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 560 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon Pro 450 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightRadeon Pro 450GeForce GTX 560
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%)
Leading raw performance (+1.7%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 560 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 560 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $40), it costs 25% less, resulting in a 35.5% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon Pro 450GeForce GTX 560
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+35.5%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40)
More affordable ($30)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 450 and GeForce GTX 560

AMD

Radeon Pro 450

The Radeon Pro 450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,723 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 560

The GeForce GTX 560 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 810 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,768 points. Launch price was $199.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro 450 scores 2,723 and the GeForce GTX 560 reaches 2,768 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 450 is built on GCN 4.0 while the GeForce GTX 560 uses Fermi 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 640 (Radeon Pro 450) vs 336 (GeForce GTX 560). Raw compute: 1.024 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 450) vs 1.089 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560).

FeatureRadeon Pro 450GeForce GTX 560
G3D Mark Score
2,723
2,768+2%
Architecture
GCN 4.0
Fermi 2.0
Process Node
14 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
640+90%
336
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.024 TFLOPS
1.089 TFLOPS+6%
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
40
56+40%
L1 Cache
160 KB
448 KB+180%
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon Pro 450GeForce GTX 560
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro 450 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 560 has 1 GB. The Radeon Pro 450 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon Pro 450) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 560) — the Radeon Pro 450 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon Pro 450GeForce GTX 560
VRAM Capacity
2 GB+100%
1 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro 450 draws 35W versus the GeForce GTX 560's 150W — a 124.3% difference. The Radeon Pro 450 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 450) vs 500W (GeForce GTX 560). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin.

FeatureRadeon Pro 450GeForce GTX 560
TDP
35W-77%
150W
Recommended PSU
350W-30%
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
2x 6-pin
Length
1mm
Slots
0
Perf/Watt
77.8+321%
18.5
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon Pro 450 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the GeForce GTX 560 launched at $199 and now averages $30. The GeForce GTX 560 costs 25% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 68.1 (Radeon Pro 450) vs 92.3 (GeForce GTX 560) — the GeForce GTX 560 offers 35.5% better value. The Radeon Pro 450 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2011).

FeatureRadeon Pro 450GeForce GTX 560
MSRP
$0-100%
$199
Avg Price (30d)
$40
$30-25%
Performance per Dollar
68.1
92.3+36%
Codename
Baffin
GF114
Release
October 30 2016
May 17 2011
Ranking
#612
#605