Radeon Pro 450
VS
GeForce GTX 770M

Radeon Pro 450 vs GeForce GTX 770M

AMD

Radeon Pro 450

2016Core: 800 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 770M

2013Core: 811 MHzBoost: 797 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 770M

#19
Radeon RX 5600
MSRP: $229|Avg: $150
92%
#44
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
195%
#46
177%
#47
176%
#51
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
160%
#52
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
159%
#54
GeForce GTX 770M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40
100%
#58
GeForce 770M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40
97%
#62
Radeon 820M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $25
96%
#65
94%
#66
94%
#68
GeForce GTX 850M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 770M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.2% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (3 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro 450.

InsightRadeon Pro 450GeForce GTX 770M
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-2.2%)
Leading raw performance (+2.2%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+50%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 770M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 770M holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $40), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 2.2% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon Pro 450GeForce GTX 770M
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+2.2%)
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 450 and GeForce GTX 770M

AMD

Radeon Pro 450

The Radeon Pro 450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,723 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 770M

The GeForce GTX 770M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 811 MHz to 797 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,784 points. Launch price was $189.99.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro 450 scores 2,723 and the GeForce GTX 770M reaches 2,784 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 450 is built on GCN 4.0 while the GeForce GTX 770M uses Kepler, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 640 (Radeon Pro 450) vs 960 (GeForce GTX 770M). Raw compute: 1.024 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 450) vs 1.53 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 770M).

FeatureRadeon Pro 450GeForce GTX 770M
G3D Mark Score
2,723
2,784+2%
Architecture
GCN 4.0
Kepler
Process Node
14 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
640
960+50%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.024 TFLOPS
1.53 TFLOPS+49%
ROPs
16
24+50%
TMUs
40
80+100%
L1 Cache
160 KB+100%
80 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB+163%
0.38 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon Pro 450GeForce GTX 770M
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro 450 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 770M has 3 GB. The GeForce GTX 770M offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon Pro 450) vs 0.38 MB (GeForce GTX 770M) — the Radeon Pro 450 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon Pro 450GeForce GTX 770M
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
3 GB+50%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
1 MB+163%
0.38 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_0 (Radeon Pro 450) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 770M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.

FeatureRadeon Pro 450GeForce GTX 770M
DirectX
12_0
12 (11_0)
Max Displays
0
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro 450) vs 1st Gen NVENC (Kepler) (GeForce GTX 770M). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs PureVideo HD VP5.

FeatureRadeon Pro 450GeForce GTX 770M
Encoder
VCE 3.4
1st Gen NVENC (Kepler)
Decoder
UVD 6.3
PureVideo HD VP5
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro 450 draws 35W versus the GeForce GTX 770M's 75W — a 72.7% difference. The Radeon Pro 450 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 450) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 770M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureRadeon Pro 450GeForce GTX 770M
TDP
35W-53%
75W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Length
1mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
77.8+110%
37.1
💰

Value Analysis

Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 68.1 (Radeon Pro 450) vs 69.6 (GeForce GTX 770M) — the GeForce GTX 770M offers 2.2% better value. The Radeon Pro 450 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2013).

FeatureRadeon Pro 450GeForce GTX 770M
MSRP
$0
Avg Price (30d)
$40
$40
Performance per Dollar
68.1
69.6+2%
Codename
Baffin
GK106
Release
October 30 2016
May 30 2013
Ranking
#612
#603