CPU
GPU
Radeon Pro 450
Popular choices:
GRID M10-2Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GRID M10-2Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro 450 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID M10-2Q.
| Insight | Radeon Pro 450 | GRID M10-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon Pro 450 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon Pro 450 holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $150), it costs 73% less, resulting in a 279.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro 450 | GRID M10-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+279.3%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($40) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 450 and GRID M10-2Q
Radeon Pro 450
The Radeon Pro 450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,723 points.
GRID M10-2Q
The GRID M10-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,692 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 450 scores 2,723 and the GRID M10-2Q reaches 2,692 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 450 is built on GCN 4.0 while the GRID M10-2Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 640 (Radeon Pro 450) vs 2,048 (GRID M10-2Q). Raw compute: 1.024 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 450) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M10-2Q).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 450 | GRID M10-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,723+1% | 2,692 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 2048+220% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.024 TFLOPS | 4.825 TFLOPS+371% |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 40 | 128+220% |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB | 768 KB+380% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro 450 | GRID M10-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon Pro 450) vs 2 MB (GRID M10-2Q) — the GRID M10-2Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 450 | GRID M10-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_0 (Radeon Pro 450) vs 12_1 (GRID M10-2Q). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 450 | GRID M10-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_0 | 12_1 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 0 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 450 draws 35W versus the GRID M10-2Q's 225W — a 146.2% difference. The Radeon Pro 450 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 450) vs 350W (GRID M10-2Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 450 | GRID M10-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35W-84% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | 1mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 77.8+548% | 12.0 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro 450 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the GRID M10-2Q launched at $2500 and now averages $150. The Radeon Pro 450 costs 73.3% less ($110 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 68.1 (Radeon Pro 450) vs 17.9 (GRID M10-2Q) — the Radeon Pro 450 offers 280.4% better value. The Radeon Pro 450 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 450 | GRID M10-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $2500 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40-73% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 68.1+280% | 17.9 |
| Codename | Baffin | GM204 |
| Release | October 30 2016 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #612 | #433 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Pro 450 and GRID M10-2Q
