Radeon Pro 450 vs Quadro M620

Radeon Pro 450

2016Core: 800 MHz

Quadro M620

2017Core: 756 MHzBoost: 977 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Radeon Pro 450

2,723

0.0%

Radeon Vega 10

Radeon R9 M360

Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U

Radeon RX Vega 11 PRD

2,758

+1.3%

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro M620 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro 450.

Insight	Radeon Pro 450	Quadro M620
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.3%)	✅Leading raw performance (+1.3%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Quadro M620 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro M620 holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $40), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 1.3% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Radeon Pro 450	Quadro M620
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+1.3%)
Upfront Cost	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon Pro 450 Benchmark Check

Quadro M620 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 450 and Quadro M620

Radeon Pro 450

The Radeon Pro 450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,723 points.

Quadro M620

The Quadro M620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 756 MHz to 977 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,758 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro 450 scores 2,723 and the Quadro M620 reaches 2,758 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 450 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Quadro M620 uses Maxwell, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 640 (Radeon Pro 450) vs 512 (Quadro M620). Raw compute: 1.024 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 450) vs 1 TFLOPS (Quadro M620).

Feature	Radeon Pro 450	Quadro M620
G3D Mark Score	2,723	2,758+1%
Architecture	GCN 4.0	Maxwell
Process Node	14 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	640+25%	512
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.024 TFLOPS+2%	1 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	40+25%	32
L1 Cache	160 KB	256 KB+60%
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon Pro 450	Quadro M620
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon Pro 450) vs 2 MB (Quadro M620) — the Quadro M620 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon Pro 450	Quadro M620
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_0 (Radeon Pro 450) vs 12_1 (Quadro M620). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 0.

Feature	Radeon Pro 450	Quadro M620
DirectX	12_0	12_1
Max Displays	0	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro 450) vs NVENC 5th Gen (Quadro M620). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs NVDEC 2nd Gen.

Feature	Radeon Pro 450	Quadro M620
Encoder	VCE 3.4	NVENC 5th Gen
Decoder	UVD 6.3	NVDEC 2nd Gen

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro 450 draws 35W versus the Quadro M620's 30W — a 15.4% difference. The Quadro M620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 450) vs 350W (Quadro M620). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.

Feature	Radeon Pro 450	Quadro M620
TDP	35W	30W-14%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	1mm	1mm
Slots	0	0
Perf/Watt	77.8	91.9+18%

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon Pro 450 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the Quadro M620 launched at $0 and now averages $40. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 68.1 (Radeon Pro 450) vs 69.0 (Quadro M620) — the Quadro M620 offers 1.3% better value. The Quadro M620 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2016).