Radeon Pro 460 vs Quadro 7000
Radeon Pro 460
Popular choices:
Quadro 7000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon Pro 460 is positioned at rank 176 and the Quadro 7000 is on rank 398, so the Radeon Pro 460 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro 460
Performance Per Dollar Quadro 7000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro 7000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score and 200% more VRAM (6 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro 460.
| Insight | Radeon Pro 460 | Quadro 7000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+200%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon Pro 460 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon Pro 460 holds the technical lead. Priced at $150 (vs $300), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 97% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro 460 | Quadro 7000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+97%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($150) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 460 and Quadro 7000
Radeon Pro 460
The Radeon Pro 460 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 907 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,453 points.
Quadro 7000
The Quadro 7000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 2 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 651 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 204W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,505 points. Launch price was $14,499.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 460 scores 3,453 and the Quadro 7000 reaches 3,505 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 460 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Quadro 7000 uses Fermi 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon Pro 460) vs 512 (Quadro 7000). Raw compute: 1.858 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 460) vs 1.3322 TFLOPS (Quadro 7000).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 460 | Quadro 7000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,453 | 3,505+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024+100% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.858 TFLOPS+39% | 1.3322 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 48+200% |
| TMUs | 64 | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 896 KB+250% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+33% | 0.75 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro 460 | Quadro 7000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro 460 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro 7000 has 6 GB. The Quadro 7000 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon Pro 460) vs 0.75 MB (Quadro 7000) — the Radeon Pro 460 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 460 | Quadro 7000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 6 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+33% | 0.75 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 460 draws 35W versus the Quadro 7000's 204W — a 141.4% difference. The Radeon Pro 460 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 460) vs 350W (Quadro 7000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 460 | Quadro 7000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35W-83% | 204W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 98.7+474% | 17.2 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro 460 launched at $500 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the Quadro 7000 launched at $14499 and now averages $300. The Radeon Pro 460 costs 50% less ($150 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 23.0 (Radeon Pro 460) vs 11.7 (Quadro 7000) — the Radeon Pro 460 offers 96.6% better value. The Radeon Pro 460 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2012).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 460 | Quadro 7000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500-97% | $14499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150-50% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 23.0+97% | 11.7 |
| Codename | Baffin | GF110 |
| Release | October 30 2016 | May 2 2012 |
| Ranking | #547 | #541 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Pro 460 and Quadro 7000
